CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 47Digital Transformation in IndustryService and Product InnovationDigital Innovation in Industries

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Creating the foundation for digital twins in the manufacturing industry: an integrated installed base management system

Olivotti, Daniel, Dreyer, Sonja, Lebek, Benedikt, Breitner, Michael H.·2019·Information Systems and e-Business Management
DOI 10.1007/s10257-018-0376-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10257-018-0376-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 50 · Cited by 47

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Alam KM, El Saddik A (2017) A digital twin architecture reference model for the cloud-based cyber-physical systems. IEEE Access 5:2050–2062. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2657006 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bagheri B, Yang S, Kao H-A, Lee J (2015) Cyber-physical systems architecture for self-aware machines in industry 4.0 environment. IFAC PapOnline 48(3):1622–1627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.318 · DOI
  3. Barrett M, Davidson E, Prabhu J, Vargo SL (2015) Service innovation in the digital age: key contributions and future directions. MISQ 39(1):135–154. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2015/39:1.03 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Borchers HW, Karandikar H (2006) A data warehouse approach for estimating and characterizing the installed base of industrial products. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on service systems and service management, Troyes, October 25–27, 2006, pp 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/icsssm.2006.320588 · DOI
  5. Cohen MA (2012) Product performance based business models: a service based perspective. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Maui, January 4–7, pp 4814–4819. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2012.672 · DOI
  6. Demoly F, Kiritsis D (2012) Asset optimization and predictive maintenance in discrete manufacturing industry. IFAC Proc 45(31):1–6. https://doi.org/10.3182/20121122-2-ES-4026.00033 · DOI
  7. Desta T, Garfield M, Meshesha M (2014) Proposing a knowledge management system (KMS) architecture to promote knowledge sharing among employees. In: Proceedings of the European conference on information systems, Tel Aviv, June 9–11, 2014, Paper 7
  8. Dillon A, Turnbull D (2005) Information architecture. Encycl Libr Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS-120017582 · DOI
  9. Dreyer S, Olivotti D, Lebek B, Breitner MH (2017) Towards a smart services enabling information architecture for installed base management in manufacturing. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik proceedings 2017, St. Gallen, Switzerland, February 12–15, 2017, pp 31–45
  10. Fabian B, Kunz S, Konnegen M, Müller S, Günther O (2012) Access control for semantic data federations in industrial product-lifecycle management. Comput Ind 63:930–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.08.015 · DOI
  11. Fellmann M, Hucke S, Breitschwerdt R, Thomas O, Blinn N, Schlicker M (2011) Supporting technical customer services with mobile devices: towards an integrated information system architecture. In: Proceedings of the 17th Americas conference on information systems, Detroit, August 4–8, 2011, Paper 250
  12. Gabor T, Belzner L, Kiermeier M, Beck MT, Neitz A (2016) A simulation-based architecture for smart cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE international conference on autonomic computing, Würzburg, July 18–22, 2016, pp 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1109/icac.2016.29 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Haider A (2011) Information technologies for engineering asset management—cultural and technical barriers. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information resources management, Seoul, June 12–14, 2011, Paper 4
  14. Hassanzadeh A, Modi S, Mulchandani S (2015) Towards effective security control assignment in the Industrial Internet of Things. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE world forum on internet of things Milan, Italia, December 14–16, 2015, pp 795–800 · DOI
  15. Herterich M, Peters C, Neff A, Uebernickel F, Brenner W (2015) Mobile work support for field service: a literature review and directions for future research. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik proceedings 2015, Osnabrück, Germany, March 4–6, 2015, Paper 10
  16. Iivari J (2007) A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scand J Inf Syst 19(2):39–64
  17. Iung B, Levrat E, Crespo Marquez A, Erbe H (2007) E-maintenance: principles. Rev Concept Framew IFAC Proc 40(19):19–29. https://doi.org/10.3182/20071002-MX-4-3906.00005 · DOI
  18. Ivezic N, Kulvatunyou B, Srinivasan V (2014) On architecting and composing through-life engineering information services to enable smart manufacturing. Proc CIRP 22:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.004 · DOI
  19. Jalil MN, Zuidwijk RA, Fleischmann M, van Nunen JAEE (2011) Spare parts logistics and installed base information. J Oper Res Soc 62(3):442–457. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.38 · DOI
  20. Jun H-B, Shin J-H, Kiritsis D, Xirouchakis P (2007) System architecture for closed-loop PLM. Int J Comput Integrat Manuf 20(7):684–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920701566624 · DOI
  21. Kennedy D, Keskin T (2016) A pricing model for the internet of things enabled smart service systems. In: Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kauai, January 5–8, 2016, pp 1782–1789 · DOI
  22. Lee J, Ardakani HD, Yang S, Bagheri B (2015) Industrial big data analytics and cyber-physical systems for future maintenance and service innovation. Proc CIRP 38:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.026 · DOI
  23. Li H, Parlikad AK (2016) Social internet of industrial things for industrial and manufacturing assets. IFAC PapOnline 49(28):208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.036 · DOI
  24. Lin S, Gao J, Koronios A (2006) Validating a data quality framework in engineering asset management. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australasian conference on information systems, Adelaide, December 6–8, 2006, Paper 75
  25. Lindgren R, Henfridsson O, Schultze U (2004) Design principles for competence management systems: a synthesis of an action research study. MISQ 28(3):435–472 · DOI
  26. Marchetta MG, Mayer F, Forradellas RQ (2011) A reference framework following a proactive approach for product lifecycle management. Comput Ind 62:672–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2011.04.004 · DOI
  27. Mert G, Herder CF, Menck N, Aurich JC (2016) Innovative services for customized, availability-oriented business models for the capital goods industry. Proc CIRP 47:501–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.223 · DOI
  28. Mouna BC, Dakhli SBD (2016) Knowledge management systems: a multidimensional analysis. In: Proceedings of the 10th Mediterranean conference on information systems, Paphos, September 4–6, 2016, Paper 52
  29. Neff AA, Hamel F, Herz TP, Uebernickel F, Brenner W (2013) Developing a maturity model for product–service systems in manufacturing enterprises. In: Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Asia conference on information systems, Jeju Island, June 18–22, 2013, Paper 144
  30. Neff AA, Hamel F, Herz TP, Uebernickel F, Brenner W, vom Brocke J (2014) Developing a maturity model for service systems in heavy equipment manufacturing enterprises. Inf Manag 51:895–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.05.001 · DOI
  31. Oliva R, Kallenberg R (2003) Managing the transition from products to services. Int J Serv Ind Manag 14(2):160–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310474138 · DOI
  32. Olivotti D, Passlick J, Dreyer S, Lebek B, Breitner MH (2018a) Maintenance planning using condition monitoring data. In: Kliewer N, Ehmke JF, Borndörfer R (eds) Operations research proceedings 2017. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp 543–548 · DOI
  33. Olivotti D, Passlick J, Axjonow A, Eilers D, Breitner MH (2018b) Combining machine learning and domain experience: a hybrid-learning monitor approach for industrial machines. In: Proceedings of the international conference on exploring service science 2018, Karlsruhe, Germany, September 19–21, 2018 (to be published) · DOI
  34. Pollmann M (2017) Sichere Produktion im IIoT: Hardware-basierte Sicherheitslösungen schützen Daten und Systeme. Z wirtsch Fabrikbetr 112:257–260. https://doi.org/10.3139/104.111705 · DOI
  35. Rai A, Sambamurthy V (2006) Editorial notes—the growth of interest in services management: opportunities for information systems scholars. Inf Syst Res 17(4):327–331. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0108 · DOI
  36. Rosemann M, Vessey I (2008) Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: the role of applicability checks. MISQ 32(1):1–22 · DOI
  37. Schmidt A, Otto B, Österle H (2011) A functional reference model for manufacturing execution systems in the automotive industry. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik proceedings 2011, Zurich, Switzerland, February 16–18, 2011, Paper 89
  38. Schmidt B, Wang L, Galara D (2017) Semantic framework for predictive maintenance in a cloud environment. Proc CIRP 62:583–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.06.047 · DOI
  39. Schröder WE, Sagadin J (2013) Das Management des Produktionsfaktors Anlage—Von der betrieblichen Instandhaltung zur ganzheitlichen integrierten Anlagenbewirtschaftung. Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatsh 158(7):274–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-013-0155-7 · DOI
  40. Schrödl H, Bensch S (2013) E-procurement of cloud-based information systems—a product–service system approach. In: Proceedings of the 34th international conference on information systems, Milan, December 15–18
  41. Sein MK, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R (2011) Action design research. MISQ 35(1):37–56 · DOI
  42. Shih SC, Hsu SHY, Zhu Z, Balasubramanian SK (2012) Knowledge sharing—a key role in the downstream supply chain. Inf Manag 49:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.01.001 · DOI
  43. Suh S-H, Yoon J-S, Yoon S-C (2011) Ubiquitous factory: vision, architecture and methodology. IFAC Proc 44(1):1608–1613. https://doi.org/10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.03093 · DOI
  44. Wagner C, Epple U, Grothoff J, Drath R, Hoffmeister M, Malakuti S, Grüner S, Zimmermann P (2017) The role of the industry 4.0 asset administration shell and the digital twin during the life cycle of a plant. In: Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation, Limassol, September 12–15, pp 1–8
  45. Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MISQ 22(6):xiiii–xxiii
  46. Wohlfeld D, Weiss V, Becker B (2017) Digital shadow—from production to product. In: Proceedings of the 17. Internationales Stuttgarter Symposium Automobil- und Motorentechnik, Stuttgart, Germany, March 14–15, 2017, pp 783–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16988-6_61 · DOI
  47. Xiang F, Yin Q, Wang Z, Jiang GZ (2018) Systematic method for big manufacturing data integration and sharing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:3345–3358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0575-8 · DOI
  48. Yang KH (2008) Finding critical success factors of ubiquitous supply chain management. In: Proceedings of the 12th Pacific Asia conference on information systems, Suzhou, July 10–12, 2008, Paper 22
  49. Zhuang C, Liu J, Xiong H (2018) Digital twin-based smart production management and control framework for the complex product assembly shop-floor. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:1149–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1617-6 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Olivotti, D., Dreyer, S., Lebek, B., & Breitner, M. H.
Affiliations
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Olivotti, Daniel
ORCID
Venue
Information Systems and e-Business Management
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-08-10
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
89-116
ISSN
  • 1617-9846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1617-9854
DOI
10.1007/s10257-018-0376-0
OpenAlex
W2886688591
Cited by
47
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Information Systems and e-Business Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
Keywords
digital twin, manufacturing services, product-service systems, machine availability, downtime reduction, sensor data, data structuring, design principles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Creating the foundation for digital twins in the manufacturing industry: an integrated installed base management system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10257-018-0376-0
The paper
Olivotti, D., Dreyer, S., Lebek, B., & Breitner, M. H. (2019). Creating the foundation for digital twins in the manufacturing industry: an integrated installed base management system. Information Systems and e-Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-018-0376-0