Cited by 61Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMedical Imaging and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MedYOLO: A Medical Image Object Detection Framework

Open access
Sobek, Joseph, Medina Inojosa, Jose R., Medina Inojosa, Betsy J., Rassoulinejad-Mousavi, S. M., Conte, Gian Marco, Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco, Erickson, Bradley J.·2024·Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine

Abstract

Artificial intelligence-enhanced identification of organs, lesions, and other structures in medical imaging is typically done using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) designed to make voxel-accurate segmentations of the region of interest. However, the labels required to train these CNNs are time-consuming to generate and require attention from subject matter experts to ensure quality. For tasks where voxel-level precision is not required, object detection models offer a viable alternative that can reduce annotation effort. Despite this potential application, there are few options for general-purpose object detection frameworks available for 3-D medical imaging. We report on MedYOLO, a 3-D object detection framework using the one-shot detection method of the YOLO family of models and designed for use with medical imaging. We tested this model on four different datasets: BRaTS, LIDC, an abdominal organ Computed tomography (CT) dataset, and an ECG-gated heart CT dataset. We found our models achieve high performance on a diverse range of structures even without hyperparameter tuning, reaching mean average precision (mAP) at intersection over union (IoU) 0.5 of 0.861 on BRaTS, 0.715 on the abdominal CT dataset, and 0.995 on the heart CT dataset. However, the models struggle with some structures, failing to converge on LIDC resulting in a mAP@0.5 of 0.0.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10278-024-01138-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Baumgartner M., Jäger P.F., Isensee F., Maier-Hein K.H.: nnDetection: A Self-configuring Method for Medical Object Detection. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87240-3_51, 2021 · DOI
  2. Redmon J, Farhadi A: YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.08242, 2016 · DOI · Paper page
  3. U. Baid, et al.: The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classification. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.02314, 2021 · DOI
  4. B. H. Menze, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, K. Farahani, J. Kirby, et al.: The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 34:1993-2024, 2015 · DOI · Paper page
  5. S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras, M. Bilello, M. Rozycki, J.S. Kirby, et al.: Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Sci Data 4:170117, 2017 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Armato III, S. G., et al.: Data From LIDC-IDRI. The Cancer Imaging Archive. https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2015.LO9QL9SX, 2015 · DOI
  7. Armato III, S.G., et al.: The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): A completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans. Medical Physics 38:915—931, 2011 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Weston, A.D., et al.: Complete abdomen and pelvis segmentation using U-net variant architecture. Med. Phys., 47:5609-5618, 2020 · DOI
  9. Philbrick, K.A., et al.: RIL-Contour: A Medical Imaging Dataset Annotation Tool for and with Deep Learning. Journal of Digital Imaging 32:574-581, 2019 · DOI
  10. Lin, T.-Y., et al.: Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1405.0312, 2015 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Rouzrokh, P. et al.: Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Model for Assessment of Hip Dislocation Risk Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty From Postoperative Radiographs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.028, 2021 · DOI
  12. Wang, C.-Y., et al.: YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.13616, 2024 · DOI
  13. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980, 2014 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sobek, J., Medina Inojosa, J. R., Medina Inojosa, B. J., Rassoulinejad-Mousavi, S. M., Conte, G. M., Lopez-Jimenez, F., & Erickson, B. J.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Sobek, Joseph
Venue
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
Published
2024-06-06
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
3208-3216
ISSN
  • 0897-1889 (ISSN-L)
  • 2948-2933
OpenAlex
W4399393690
Cited by
61
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 10
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
3D object detection, YOLO, medical image object detection, organ detection, lesion detection, annotation cost reduction, BraTS, LIDC, abdominal CT
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Heart, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Neural Networks, Computer, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review