Higher sorption of arsenate versus arsenite on amorphous Al-oxide, effect of ligands
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In acidic environments, all the ligands prevented the sorption of arsenite on ferrihydrite more than that of arsenate, but in alkaline systems, arsenite and arsenate seemed to be retained with the same strength.
“In acidic environments, all the ligands prevented the sorption of arsenite on ferrihydrite more than that of arsenate, but in alkaline systems, arsenite and arsenate seemed to be retained with the same strength.”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [53]
On noncrystalline Al oxides, higher sorption of arsenate versus arsenite was always evidenced in a wide range of pH, both in the absence or presence of organic ligands.
“In contrast, on noncrystalline Al oxides, higher sorption of arsenate versus arsenite was always evidenced in a wide range of pH, both in the absence or presence of organic ligands.”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [53]
The efficiency of most of the competing anions in preventing the sorption of the metalloids decreased by increasing the pH.
“The efficiency of most of the competing anions in preventing the sorption of the metalloids decreased by increasing the pH.”
From Chemical Processes Affecting the Mobility of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments (2016) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Zhu, J., Pigna, M., Cozzolino, V., Caporale, A. G., & Violante, A.
- Affiliations
- Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Violante, Antonio
- Venue
- Environmental Chemistry Letters
- Published
- 2013-02-28
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-294
- ISSN
- 1610-3653 (ISSN-L)
- 1610-3661
- OpenAlex
- W2048297571
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environmental Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
- Keywords
- arsenate adsorption, amorphous aluminum oxide, organic ligands, inorganic ligands, phosphate, citrate, malate, oxalate, tartrate, sulfate, selenate, selenite, arsenic mobility, arsenic bioavailability, arsenic contamination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
