Algal Biomass Valorization for Biofuel Production and Carbon Sequestration: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The world is experiencing an energy crisis and environmental issues due to the depletion of fossil fuels and the continuous increase in carbon dioxide concentrations. Microalgal biofuels are produced using sunlight, water, and simple salt minerals. Their high growth rate, photosynthesis, and carbon dioxide sequestration capacity make them one of the most important biorefinery platforms. Furthermore, microalgae's ability to alter their metabolism in response to environmental stresses to produce relatively high levels of high-value compounds makes them a promising alternative to fossil fuels. As a result, microalgae can significantly contribute to long-term solutions to critical global issues such as the energy crisis and climate change. The environmental benefits of algal biofuel have been demonstrated by significant reductions in carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and sulfur oxide emissions. Microalgae-derived biomass has the potential to generate a wide range of commercially important high-value compounds, novel materials, and feedstock for a variety of industries, including cosmetics, food, and feed. This review evaluates the potential of using microalgal biomass to produce a variety of bioenergy carriers, including biodiesel from stored lipids, alcohols from reserved carbohydrate fermentation, and hydrogen, syngas, methane, biochar and bio-oils via anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, and gasification. Furthermore, the potential use of microalgal biomass in carbon sequestration routes as an atmospheric carbon removal approach is being evaluated. The cost of algal biofuel production is primarily determined by culturing (77%), harvesting (12%), and lipid extraction (7.9%). As a result, the choice of microalgal species and cultivation mode (autotrophic, heterotrophic, and mixotrophic) are important factors in controlling biomass and bioenergy production, as well as fuel properties. The simultaneous production of microalgal biomass in agricultural, municipal, or industrial wastewater is a low-cost option that could significantly reduce economic and environmental costs while also providing a valuable remediation service. Microalgae have also been proposed as a viable candidate for carbon dioxide capture from the atmosphere or an industrial point source. Microalgae can sequester 1.3 kg of carbon dioxide to produce 1 kg of biomass. Using potent microalgal strains in efficient design bioreactors for carbon dioxide sequestration is thus a challenge. Microalgae can theoretically use up to 9% of light energy to capture and convert 513 tons of carbon dioxide into 280 tons of dry biomass per hectare per year in open and closed cultures. Using an integrated microalgal bio-refinery to recover high-value-added products could reduce waste and create efficient biomass processing into bioenergy. To design an efficient atmospheric carbon removal system, algal biomass cultivation should be coupled with thermochemical technologies, such as pyrolysis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The main energy carriers obtained from microalgae include biodiesel produced from the lipids accumulated in their cells, hydrogen produced by photobiological processes, biomethane produced by fermentation processes, and biomass that can be used by pyrolysis, gasification, or direct combustion technologies.
“The main energy carriers obtained from microalgae include biodiesel produced from the lipids accumulated in their cells, hydrogen produced by photobiological processes, biomethane produced by fermentation processes, and biomass that can be used by pyrolysis, gasification, or direct combustion technologies [29-31].”
From Multi-Sensing Monitoring of the Microalgae Biomass Cultivation Systems for Biofuels and Added Value Products Synthesis—Challenges and Opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 220 · Cited by 380
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Chamola R et al (2020) Direct transesterification for biodiesel extrac- tion from micro-algal biomass: a review. Int J Appl Eng Res 14(9):180-184
- Grayburn W et al (2013) Harvesting, oil extraction, and conversion of local filamentous algae growing in wastewater into biodiesel. Int J Energy Environ 4(2):185
- Hassan SH et al (2012) Effect of different growth conditions on cer- tain biochemical parameters of different cyanobacterial strains. Malays J Microbiol 8(4):266-272
- Khola G et al (2012) Biodiesel production from algae. Pak J Bot 44(1):379-381
- Kuo C-T (2011) Harvesting natural algal blooms for concurrent biofuel production and hypoxia mitigation. M.S Thesis. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship. http:// hdl. handle. net/ 2142/ 18541
- Lam MK et al. (2019) Scale-up and commercialization of algal cultiva- tion and biofuels production. In: Biofuels from algae, Elsevier. pp 475-506. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1590/ 1678-4324-20191 60816 · DOI
- Makareviciene V et al (2011) Cultivation of microalgae Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. as a potentional biofuel feedstock. Environ Res Eng Manag 57(3):21-27
- Ramaraj R et al (2010) Algae growth in natural water resources. J Soil Water Conserv 42(4):439-450
- Authors
- Sarwer, A., Hamed, S. M., Osman, A. I., Jamil, F., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., Alhajeri, N. S., & Rooney, D. W.
- Affiliations
- COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
- Agricultural Research Center (EG)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
- Kuwait University (KW)
- Corresponding author
- Sarwer, Asma
- Hamed, Seham M.
- Osman, Ahmed I.
- Jamil, Farrukh
- Al-Muhtaseb, Ala’a H.
- Alhajeri, Nawaf S.
- Rooney, David W.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Environmental Chemistry Letters
- Published
- 2022-06-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2797-2851
- ISSN
- 1610-3653 (ISSN-L)
- 1610-3661
- OpenAlex
- W4282975702
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 220
- Citations by year
- 2026: 97 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Environmental Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- SEUPB (Bryden Centre project (Project ID VA5048))
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Keywords
- microalgae, algal biomass valorization, microalgal biofuels, carbon sequestration, CO2 capture, biodiesel, fat deposition, carbohydrate fermentation, biohydrogen, syngas, methane, bio-oil, anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, gasification, biochar, biorefinery, wastewater treatment, mixotrophic cultivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review