Cited by 38Genetic diversity and population structureEvolution and Paleontology StudiesAvian ecology and behavior

Phylogeny and phylogeography of critically endangered Gyps species based on nuclear and mitochondrial markers

Arshad, Muhammad, Gonzalez, Javier, El-Sayed, Abdel Aziz, Osborne, Tim, Wink, Michael·2009·Journal of Ornithology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10336-008-0359-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Arshad, M., Gonzalez, J., El-Sayed, A. A., Osborne, T., & Wink, M.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Arshad, Muhammad
Venue
Journal of Ornithology
Published
2008-12-03
Volume
150
Issue
2
Pages
419-430
ISSN
  • 2193-7192 (ISSN-L)
  • 2193-7206
OpenAlex
W2157041498
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal für Ornithologie (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Environment and Tourism Namibia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
Gyp, vultures, phylogeny, phylogeography, Gyps bengalensis, Gyps indicus, Gyps fulvus, Gyps tenuirostris, Gyps rueppellii, Gyps coprotheres, RAG1, cytochrome b, monophyly, species delimitation, molecular clock, diversification rates, critically endangered species, Indian subcontinent

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review