The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colonic Surgery With Accelerated Rehabilitation or Conventional Care
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing colonic surgery, the postoperative hospital stay is usually 6 to 10 days, and the morbidity rate is 15 to 20 percent. Fast-track rehabilitation programs have reduced the hospital stay to 2 to 3 days. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcome after colonic resection with conventional care compared with fast-track multimodal rehabilitation. METHODS: One hundred thirty consecutive patients receiving conventional care (group 1) in one hospital were compared with 130 consecutive patients receiving multimodal, fast-track rehabilitation (group 2) in another hospital. Outcomes were time to first defecation after surgery, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity during the first postoperative month. RESULTS: Median age was 74 years (group 1) and 72 years (group 2). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was significantly higher in group 2 ( P < 0.05). Defecation occurred on day 4.5 in group 1 and day 2 in group 2 ( P < 0.05). Median hospital stay was 8 days in group 1 and 2 days in group 2 ( P < 0.05). The use of a nasogastric tube was longer in group 1 ( P < 0.05). The overall complication rate (35 patients) was lower in group 2 ( P < 0.05), especially cardiopulmonary complications (5 patients; P < 0.01). Readmission was necessary in 12 percent of cases for group 1 and 20 percent in group 2 ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Time to first defecation, hospital stay, and morbidity may be reduced after colonic resection with fast-track multimodal rehabilitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gustafsson, U. O., Scott, M. J., Schwenk, W., Demartines, N., Roulin, D., Francis, N., McNaught, C. E., MacFie, J., Liberman, A. S., Soop, M., et al. (2013) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0 · Cited by 1,082
Gustafsson, U. O. (2011) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.309 · Cited by 936
Adamina, M., Kehlet, H., Tomlinson, G. A., Senagore, A. J., & Delaney, C. P. (2011) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003 · Cited by 555
Self-citationA protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection
Maessen, J., Dejong, C. H. C., Hausel, J., Nygren, J., Lassen, K., Andersen, J., Kessels, A. G. H., Revhaug, A., Kehlet, H., Ljungqvist, O., et al. (2007) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5468 · Cited by 533
Self-citationWhite, P. F., Kehlet, H., Neal, J. M., Schricker, T., Carr, D. B., & Carli, F. (2007) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000263034.96885.e1 · Cited by 485
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Basse, L., Thorbøl, J. E., Løssl, K., & Kehlet, H.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-278
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063418764
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colonic Surgery With Accelerated Rehabilitation or Conventional Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10350-003-0055-0
- The paper
- Basse, L., Thorbøl, J. E., Løssl, K., & Kehlet, H. (2004). Colonic Surgery With Accelerated Rehabilitation or Conventional Care. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-003-0055-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.