Association of alcohol use with problematic mobile phone use and depressive symptoms among college students in Anhui, China
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PSU was positively associated with monthly cost of living, family income, and higher economic status.
“PSU was also positively associated with monthly cost of living [28], family income [36], and a higher economic status [42].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Tao, S., Wu, X., Zhang, S., Tong, S., Hao, J., & Tao, F.
- Affiliations
- Anhui Medical University (CN)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hao, Jiahu
- Tao, Fangbiao
- Venue
- Journal of Public Health
- Published
- 2016-10-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-112
- ISSN
- 0943-1853 (ISSN-L)
- 2198-1833
- 1613-2238
- OpenAlex
- W2534215256
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (30972494)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- problematic mobile phone use, alcohol consumption, depressive symptoms, university students, multiplicative interaction, excessive mobile phone use, university mental health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
