Cited by 78Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorSocial Media in Health Education

Online health information seeking and health literacy among non-medical college students: gender differences

Hassan, Sherine, Masoud, Omar·2021·Journal of Public Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10389-020-01243-w

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hassan, S., & Masoud, O.
Affiliations
  • Alexandria University (EG)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hassan, Sherine
Venue
Journal of Public Health
Published
2020-03-09
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1267-1273
ISSN
  • 0943-1853 (ISSN-L)
  • 2198-1833
  • 1613-2238
OpenAlex
W3010738934
Cited by
78
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
online health information seeking, health literacy, gender differences, university students, mobile health, Google, YouTube, health information reliability, reproductive health, nutrition information, Egypt

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review