An Ecosystems and Vulnerable Populations Perspective on Solastalgia and Psychological Distress After a Wildfire
Open accessAbstract
We studied the relationship between psychological distress and relative resource and risk predictors, including loss of solace from the landscape (solastalgia), one year after the Wallow Fire, in Arizona, United States. Solastalgia refers to the distress caused by damage to the surrounding natural environment and it has not been examined for its relationship to psychological health. Doing so opens avenues of research that inquire into how land management might be able to support improved community resilience and psychological health outcomes after a wildfire. In 2012, we conducted a household survey mailed to all 1387 households in the five communities surrounding the fire. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale assessed psychological distress. In the multivariate analysis, higher solastalgia score and an adverse financial impact of the fire were associated with clinically significant psychological distress. Annual household income ≥ $80,000 and a higher family functioning score were associated with less psychological distress. Part-time residents were no more likely to have psychological distress than full-time residents. We conclude that dramatic transformation of a landscape by an environmental event such as a wildfire can reduce its value as a source of solace. These results call for novel post-wildfire community recovery interventions that wed forest management and community psychology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers tend to conceptualize mental health solely as mental illness and mental problems, administering surveys using validated instruments that assess mental health problems such as generalized anxiety disorder, PTSD, and psychological distress following an extreme weather event.
“Researchers tend to conceptualize mental health solely as mental illness and mental problems, administering surveys using validated instruments that assess mental health problems and issues like: generalized anxiety disorder (using the general anxiety disorder, GAD-2 questionnaire), PTSD (PCL-6 checklist), and psychological distress (via the general health questionnaire, GHQ-12) following an ext”
From Climate change and mental health: risks, impacts and priority actions (2018) · cites this paper as [64]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 41 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Eisenman, D., McCaffrey, S., Donatello, I., & Marshal, G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- US Forest Service (US)
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eisenman, David
- Venue
- EcoHealth
- Published
- 2015-08-25
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 602-610
- ISSN
- 1612-9202 (ISSN-L)
- 1612-9210
- OpenAlex
- W2129212593
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Locations
- EcoHealth (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Forest Service (09-JV-11242309-042)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Keywords
- solastalgia, psychological distress, forest fires, vulnerable populations, ecosystem services, household income, family functioning, community resilience, forest management, community psychology
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arizona, Mental Disorders, Female, Fires, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Ecosystem, Vulnerable Populations, Resilience, Psychological, Disaster Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review