Cited by 124Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Management and ResilienceFire effects on ecosystems

An Ecosystems and Vulnerable Populations Perspective on Solastalgia and Psychological Distress After a Wildfire

Open access
Eisenman, David, McCaffrey, Sarah, Donatello, Ian, Marshal, Grant·2015·EcoHealth

Abstract

We studied the relationship between psychological distress and relative resource and risk predictors, including loss of solace from the landscape (solastalgia), one year after the Wallow Fire, in Arizona, United States. Solastalgia refers to the distress caused by damage to the surrounding natural environment and it has not been examined for its relationship to psychological health. Doing so opens avenues of research that inquire into how land management might be able to support improved community resilience and psychological health outcomes after a wildfire. In 2012, we conducted a household survey mailed to all 1387 households in the five communities surrounding the fire. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale assessed psychological distress. In the multivariate analysis, higher solastalgia score and an adverse financial impact of the fire were associated with clinically significant psychological distress. Annual household income ≥ $80,000 and a higher family functioning score were associated with less psychological distress. Part-time residents were no more likely to have psychological distress than full-time residents. We conclude that dramatic transformation of a landscape by an environmental event such as a wildfire can reduce its value as a source of solace. These results call for novel post-wildfire community recovery interventions that wed forest management and community psychology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10393-015-1052-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers tend to conceptualize mental health solely as mental illness and mental problems, administering surveys using validated instruments that assess mental health problems such as generalized anxiety disorder, PTSD, and psychological distress following an extreme weather event.

    “Researchers tend to conceptualize mental health solely as mental illness and mental problems, administering surveys using validated instruments that assess mental health problems and issues like: generalized anxiety disorder (using the general anxiety disorder, GAD-2 questionnaire), PTSD (PCL-6 checklist), and psychological distress (via the general health questionnaire, GHQ-12) following an ext”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 124

Authors
Eisenman, D., McCaffrey, S., Donatello, I., & Marshal, G.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Eisenman, David
Venue
EcoHealth
Published
2015-08-25
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
602-610
ISSN
  • 1612-9202 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-9210
OpenAlex
W2129212593
Cited by
124
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EcoHealth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Forest Service (09-JV-11242309-042)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
solastalgia, psychological distress, forest fires, vulnerable populations, ecosystem services, household income, family functioning, community resilience, forest management, community psychology
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arizona, Mental Disorders, Female, Fires, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Ecosystem, Vulnerable Populations, Resilience, Psychological, Disaster Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review