Cited by 8Intestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsHemostasis and retained surgical itemsSurgical Sutures and Adhesives

Efficiency of TachoSil® to prevent postsurgical adhesion development on laparoscopic rat model

Open access
Nohuz, Erdogan, Darcha, Claude, Moreno, Wagner, Tamburro, Stefano, Yanez, Margarita, Mulliez, Aurélien, Grizard, Geneviève, Mage, Gérard +1 more·2009·Gynecological Surgery

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10397-009-0496-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following standardized injury to the uterine horn, corpus, and peritoneum, TachoSil® application resulted in markedly lower adhesion scores compared to untreated controls: 12.96 vs. 21.66 for the peritoneum, 7.22 vs. 15.20 for the uterine horn, and 5.88 vs. 34.52 for the uterine corpus.

    “Following standardized injury to the uterine horn, corpus, and peritoneum, the TachoSil® application resulted in markedly lower adhesion scores compared to untreated controls: 12.96 vs. 21.66 for the peritoneum, 7.22 vs. 15.20 for the uterine horn, and 5.88 vs. 34.52 for the uterine corpus.”
  • In a randomized, controlled laparoscopic rat model, TachoSil® significantly reduced postoperative adhesion formation.

    “In a randomized, controlled laparoscopic rat model, TachoSil®, a fibrinogen- and thrombin-coated collagen sponge, significantly reduced postoperative adhesion formation [67].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, McGuire A, Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, O'Brien F, Buchan S, Crowe AM (1999) Adhesion related hospital read- missions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 353(9163):1476-1480
  2. Canis M, Botchorishvili R, Wattiez A, Rabischong B, Houlle C, Pouly JL, Manhes H, Bruhat MA (2001) Prevention of peritoneal adhesions. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 30(4):305-324
  3. Mage G, Pouly JL, de Bouquet JJ, Chabrand S, Bruhat MA (1984) Distal tubal obstructions : microsurgery or in vitro fertilization. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 13(8):933-937
  4. diZerega GS, Campeau JD (2001) Peritoneal repair and post- surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Updat 7(6):547-555
  5. diZerega GS (2000) Morphogenesis of adhesion formation. In: DiZerega GS (ed) Peritoneal surgery. Springer, New York, pp 17-23
  6. Forestier D, Slim K, Joubert-Zakeyh J, Nini E, Déchelotte P, Chipponi J (2002) Do bipolar scissors increase postoperative adhesions? An experimental double-blind randomized trial. Ann Chir 127(9):680-684
  7. Mecke H, Riedel HH, Möhlmann L, Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Becker K, Mees C (1988) An animal experiment study. Zentralbl Gynakol 110(7):433-442
  8. Canis M, Matsuzaki S, Bourdel N, Jardon K, Cotte B, Botchorishvili R, Rabischong B, Mage G (2007) Peritoneum and laparoscopic environment. Bull Cancer 94(12):1043-1051
  9. Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Källfelt B, Thorburn J, Lindblom B (1991) Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril 55(5):911-915
  10. Maier DB, Nulsen JC, Klock A, Luciano AA (1992) Laser laparoscopy versus laparotomy in lysis of pelvic adhesions. J Reprod Med 37(12):965-968
  11. Luciano AA, Maier DB, Koch EI, Nulsen JC, Whitman GF (1989) A comparative study of postoperative adhesions following laser surgery by laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the rabbit model. Obstet Gynecol 74(2):220-224
  12. Fowler JM, Hartenbach EM, Reynolds HT, Borner J, Carter JR, Carlson JW, Twiggs LB, Carson LF (1994) Pelvic adhesion formation after pelvic lymphadenectomy: comparison between transperitoneal laparoscopy and extraperitoneal laparotomy in a porcine model. Gynecol Oncol 55(1):25-28
  13. Elkelani OA, Molinas CR, Mynbaev O, Koninckx PR (2002) Prevention of adhesions with cristalloids during laparoscopic surgery in mice. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9(4):447-452
  14. Molinas CR, Mynbaev O, Pauwels A, Novak P, Koninckx PR (2001) Peritoneal mesothelial hypoxia during pneumoperitoneum is a cofactor in adhesion formation in a laparoscopic mouse model. Fertil Steril 76(3):560-567
  15. diZerega GS, Tulandi T (2008) Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions in gynaecological surgery. Reprod Biomed Online 17 (3):303-306
  16. Anegg U, Rychlik R, Smolle-Jüttner F (2008) Do the benefits of shorter hospital stay associated with the use of fleece-bound sealing outweigh the cost of the materials? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 7(2):292-296 discussion 226
  17. Frena A, Martin F (2006) How to improve bilio-stasis in liver surgery. Chir Ital 58(6):793-795
  18. Tagliabue F, D'Angelo C, Zuccon W, Giorgetta C, Gambarini F, Bonandrini L (2007) Use of Tachosil in splenectomy in patients with clotting and blood composition disorders. Minerva Chir 62 (1):73-78
  19. Biserte J (2007) TachoSil: the value of its use in urologic surgery. An interview with Professor Jacques Bisertes. J Chir (Paris) 144 (1):82-83
  20. Siemer S, Lahme S, Altziebler S, Machtens S, Strohmaier W, Wechsel HW, Goebell P, Schmeller N, Oberneder R, Stolzenburg JU, Becker H, Lüftenegger W, Tetens V, Van Poppel H (2007) Efficacy and safety of TachoSil as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumour resection: a randomised prospective study. Eur Urol 52(4):1156-1163
  21. Sagalowsky AI (2007) Editorial comment on: efficacy and safety of TachoSil as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumour resection: a randomised prospective study. Eur Urol 52(4):1162-1163
  22. Erdogru T, Sanli A, Celik O, Baykara M (2008) Laparoscopic transvesical repair of recurrent vesicovaginal fistula using with fleece-bound sealing system. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277(5):461- 464
  23. Nordentoft T, Rømer J, Sørensen M (2007) Sealing of gastroin- testinal anastomoses with a fibrin glue-coated collagen patch: a safety study. J Invest Surg 20(6):363-369
  24. Onorati F, Pasceri E, Scalas C, Santarpino G, Mastroroberto P, Indolfi C, Renzulli A (2008) Aortic tube grafts wrapping with hemostatic fleeces reduces postoperative pericardial effusions. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 49(3):393-397
  25. Tamasauskas A, Sinkūnas K, Draf W, Deltuva V, Matukevicius A, Rastenyte D, Vaitkus S (2008) Management of cerebrospinal fluid leak after surgical removal of pituitary adenomas. Medicina (Kaunas) 44(4):302-307
  26. Attar KH, Namasivayam J, Green J, Peters J (2008) Kidney salvage using the fibrinogen and thrombin-coated sponge Tacho- Sil during nephron-sparing surgery for the resection of large renal tumours. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(5):8-11
  27. Lacanna F, Brunati A, Reding R (2008) A new biological mesh for cut surface hemostasis in liver transplantation using technical variants. Pediatr Transplant 12(5):520-521
  28. Shimamoto T, Marui A, Nishina T, Saji Y, Komeda (2008) The TachoSil-Pledget stitch: towards eradication of suture hole bleeding. Ann Thorac Surg 86(6):2002-2004
  29. Getman V, Devyatko E, Wolner E, Aharinejad S, Mueller MR (2006) Fleece bound sealing prevents pleural adhesion. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 5(3):243-246
  30. Agdi M, Tulandi T (2008) Endoscopic management of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22(4):707-716
  31. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Bergamini V, Berlanda N (2004) Bipolar electrocoagulation versus suture of solitary ovary after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(3):344-347
  32. Li CZ, Liu B, Wen ZQ, Sun Q (2008) The impact of electro- coagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: a prospective clinical study of 191 patients. Fertil Steril (in press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nohuz, E., Darcha, C., Moreno, W., Tamburro, S., Yanez, M., Mulliez, A., Grizard, G., Mage, G., & Canis, M.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR)
Corresponding author
Nohuz, Erdogan
Venue
Gynecological Surgery
Published
2009-06-10
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
323-329
ISSN
  • 1613-2076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-2084
OpenAlex
W2061787597
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Gynecological Surgery (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemostasis and retained surgical items
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Keywords
TachoSil, postoperative adhesions, adhesion prevention, laparoscopic surgery, uterine injury, peritoneal injury, bipolar coagulation, uterine fibrosis, inflammation, absorbable biomaterials, rat model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review