Epidemiology of subtle, typical, cystic, and deep endometriosis: a systematic review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical observations suggest that the prevalence and severity of deep endometriosis have markedly increased during the past 20 years.
“Clinical observations suggest that the prevalence and severity of deep endometriosis have markedly increased during the past 20 years (58).”
From Pathogenesis of endometriosis: The genetic/epigenetic theory (2019) · cites this paper as [58]
Subtle endometriosis lesions decrease with age, whereas typical, cystic, and deep lesions increase with age, at least until menopause.
“Subtle endometriosis lesions decrease with age, whereas typical, cystic, and deep lesions increase with age, at least until menopause (58).”
From Pathogenesis of endometriosis: The genetic/epigenetic theory (2019) · cites this paper as [58]
The epidemiology of endometriosis is unclear because of a variable inclusion of subtle lesions and because of diagnostic uncertainties of hospital-based discharge records.
“The epidemiology of endometriosis is unclear because of a variable inclusion of subtle lesions and because of diagnostic uncertainties of hospital-based discharge records (64).”
From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [64]
Most rectovaginal deep endometriosis lesions, which were followed clinically without surgery, did not progress.
“Most rectovaginal deep endometriosis lesions, which were followed clinically without surgery, did not progress (clinical observations as acknowledged) (64).”
From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [64]
Clinical observation by surgeons suggests that the prevalence and severity of deep endometriosis is increasing during the past 20 years.
“Clinical observation by surgeons suggests that the prevalence and severity of deep endometriosis is increasing during the past 20 years (64).”
From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [64]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 134 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Koninckx, P. R., Ussia, A., Keckstein, J., Wattiez, A., & Adamyan, L.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Universität Ulm (DE)
- Latifa Hospital (AE)
- Russian University of Medicine (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Koninckx, Philippe R.
- Venue
- Gynecological Surgery
- Published
- 2016-08-13
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 457-467
- ISSN
- 1613-2076 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-2084
- OpenAlex
- W2509827791
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 134
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gynecological Surgery (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- endometriosis, deep infiltrating endometriosis, prevalence, incidence, disease severity, referral bias, hospital discharge data, age-related prevalence, genetic risk, pelvic pain, infertility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
