Cited by 307Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Decellularized Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Tissue as a Bioscaffold for Regenerative Medicine: Factors that Influence the Host Response

Badylak, Stephen F.·2014·Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Biologic scaffold materials composed of mammalian extracellular matrix (ECM) are prepared by decellularization of source tissues harvested from either humans (allogeneic) or a variety of other (xenogeneic) species. These matrix scaffold materials are commonly regulated and used as surgical mesh materials for applications such as ventral hernia repair, musculotendinous tissue reconstruction, dura mater replacement, reconstructive breast surgery, pelvic floor reconstruction, and the treatment of cutaneous ulcers, among others. The clinical results for these applications vary widely for reasons which include characteristics of the source tissue, methods and efficacy of tissue decellularization, and methods of processing/manufacturing. However, the primary determinant of success or failure in the clinical setting is the response of the host to these implanted biologic scaffold materials. It is logical to question why any non-self biologic material, particularly a xenogeneic material, would not elicit an early and aggressive adverse immune response. The present manuscript briefly describes the known mechanisms by which these biologic scaffold materials can facilitate a constructive remodeling response, the known causative factors of an adverse response, and provides a general discussion of the role of the macrophage in determining outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10439-013-0963-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The immunomodulatory properties of ECM bioscaffolds depend on source tissue and decellularization methods.

    “However, the immunomodulatory properties of ECM bioscaffolds are dependent on the source tissue and, critically, on the methods used for decellularization.”
  • In the absence of infection, metabolic disorder, or pharmacological immunosuppression, the immune response to an implanted ECM bioscaffold is primarily determined by the material's biochemical composition, structural integrity, and associated molecular cues.

    “In the absence of infection, metabolic disorder, or pharmacological immunosuppression, the immune response to an implanted ECM bioscaffold is primarily determined by the material's biochemical composition, structural integrity, and associated molecular cues [1,99].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 98 · Cited by 307

Authors
Badylak, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Badylak, Stephen F.
Venue
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Published
2014-01-09
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
1517-1527
ISSN
  • 0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9686
OpenAlex
W1975730998
Cited by
307
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 10
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
extracellular matrix, host immune response, surgical mesh, tissue remodeling, macrophages, regenerative medicine
MeSH terms
Animals, Bioprosthesis, Humans, Macrophages, Prosthesis Failure, Regenerative Medicine, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review