Decellularized Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Tissue as a Bioscaffold for Regenerative Medicine: Factors that Influence the Host Response
Abstract
Biologic scaffold materials composed of mammalian extracellular matrix (ECM) are prepared by decellularization of source tissues harvested from either humans (allogeneic) or a variety of other (xenogeneic) species. These matrix scaffold materials are commonly regulated and used as surgical mesh materials for applications such as ventral hernia repair, musculotendinous tissue reconstruction, dura mater replacement, reconstructive breast surgery, pelvic floor reconstruction, and the treatment of cutaneous ulcers, among others. The clinical results for these applications vary widely for reasons which include characteristics of the source tissue, methods and efficacy of tissue decellularization, and methods of processing/manufacturing. However, the primary determinant of success or failure in the clinical setting is the response of the host to these implanted biologic scaffold materials. It is logical to question why any non-self biologic material, particularly a xenogeneic material, would not elicit an early and aggressive adverse immune response. The present manuscript briefly describes the known mechanisms by which these biologic scaffold materials can facilitate a constructive remodeling response, the known causative factors of an adverse response, and provides a general discussion of the role of the macrophage in determining outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The immunomodulatory properties of ECM bioscaffolds depend on source tissue and decellularization methods.
“However, the immunomodulatory properties of ECM bioscaffolds are dependent on the source tissue and, critically, on the methods used for decellularization.”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [99]
In the absence of infection, metabolic disorder, or pharmacological immunosuppression, the immune response to an implanted ECM bioscaffold is primarily determined by the material's biochemical composition, structural integrity, and associated molecular cues.
“In the absence of infection, metabolic disorder, or pharmacological immunosuppression, the immune response to an implanted ECM bioscaffold is primarily determined by the material's biochemical composition, structural integrity, and associated molecular cues [1,99].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [99]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 307
- Authors
- Badylak, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- ORCID
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- Venue
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2014-01-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1517-1527
- ISSN
- 0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-9686
- OpenAlex
- W1975730998
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Keywords
- extracellular matrix, host immune response, surgical mesh, tissue remodeling, macrophages, regenerative medicine
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bioprosthesis, Humans, Macrophages, Prosthesis Failure, Regenerative Medicine, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review