The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programs on Writing Scientific Research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At present, LLMs cannot completely compose a novel academic text or author a research study in the way a human researcher can because although they excel at human-like text production and organisation, they still lack the ability to generate novel ideas or engage in creativity ( Hammad, 2023).”
From Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Hammad, 2023
In the citing paper
“At present, LLMs cannot completely compose a novel academic text or author a research study in the way a human researcher can because although they excel at human-like text production and organisation, they still lack the ability to generate novel ideas or engage in creativity ( Hammad, 2023).”
From Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Hammad, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Could AI help you to write your next paper?
Hutson, M. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-022-03479-w · Cited by 236
Cited by
Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?
Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2 · Cited by 827
Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool
Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update · doi:10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145 · Cited by 580
The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles.
(2023) · PubMed Central · Cited by 289
Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis
Perkins, M., & Roe, J. (2024) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.142411.2 · Cited by 123
The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT
Livberber, T., & Ayvaz, S. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammad, M.
- ORCID
- Hammad, Mohamed
- Venue
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2023-01-13
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 459-460
- ISSN
- 0090-6964
- 1573-9686
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.