Cited by 80Counseling Practices and SupervisionMental Health Treatment and AccessInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges

Expectations of and Attitudes toward Counseling: A Comparison of Asian International and U.S. Graduate Students

Yoon, Eunju, Jepsen, David A.·2008·International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10447-008-9050-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoon, E., & Jepsen, D. A.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Fresno (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Yoon, Eunju
Venue
International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling
Published
2008-04-03
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
116-127
ISSN
  • 0165-0653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3246
OpenAlex
W2078049620
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Keywords
counseling expectations, attitudes toward counseling, Asian international students, graduate students, cross-cultural comparison, barriers to counseling, language barriers, cultural issues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review