Cited by 24Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale-Short Form in Mainland China

Fang, Ke, Pieterse, Alex L, Friedlander, Myrna, Cao, Junhong·2011·International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10447-011-9137-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 24

Authors
Fang, K., Pieterse, A. L., Friedlander, M., & Cao, J.
Affiliations
University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Fang, Ke
Venue
International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling
Published
2011-10-01
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
309-321
ISSN
  • 0165-0653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3246
OpenAlex
W2085420867
Cited by
24
References
80
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
help-seeking attitudes, psychometric properties, cross-cultural adaptation, Chinese university students, factor structure, scale reliability, mental health help-seeking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review