The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Economics and energy potential of traditional agroforestry systems under contrasting ecosystems in semi arid tropics
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In an example from India, the teak-based agroforestry practice under irrigated ecosystems yielded higher benefit-cost ratios than the conventional control practice (Chittapur et al. 2020).”
From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Chittapur et al. 2020
Citations
Cites
Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview
Jose, S. (2009) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7 · Cited by 1,756
Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: A primer
Brown, S. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,320
Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information
Odum, H. T. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.242.4882.1132 · Cited by 1,262
Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview
Jose, S. (2009) · Advances in Agroforestry · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3323-9_1 · Cited by 949
Brown, S., & Lugo, A. E. (1982) · Biotropica · doi:10.2307/2388024 · Cited by 865
Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis
Torralba, M., Fagerholm, N., Burgess, P. J., Moreno, G., & Plieninger, T. (2016) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.002 · Cited by 689
Handbook of Energy Utilization In Agriculture
Pimentel, D. (2019) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781351072519 · Cited by 593
Emergy use, environmental loading and sustainability an emergy analysis of Italy
Ulgiati, S., Odum, H. T., & Bastianoni, S. (1994) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/0304-3800(94)90064-7 · Cited by 371
Modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran
Rafiee, S., Mousavi‐Avval, S. H., & Mohammadi, A. (2010) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.015 · Cited by 362
Energy requirement and economic analysis of citrus production in Turkey
Ozkan, B., Akcaoz, H., & Karadeniz, F. (2004) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2003.10.002 · Cited by 311
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Binning AS, Pathak BS, Panesar BS (1983) The energy audit of crop production system research report. School of energy studies for agriculture, Panjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
- Chaturvedi AN, Khanna LS (1981) Forest mensuration. International Book Distributors, Dehradun
- Chittapur BM, Patil DK (2017) Ecosystem services rendered by tree based land use systems. Indian J Agric Sci 87(11):1419–1429
- Dwivedi RP, Kareemulla K, Rizvi RH, Ramesh S, Kuldeep K (2014) Agroforestry practices in Aligarh district of Uttar Pradesh: a soci-economic analysis. Indian J Agrofor 16(1):21–24
- FAO (1998) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forest. FAO Corporate Document Depository, Rome
- Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting: energy and environmental decision making. Wiley, New York
- Singh JM (2002) On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana. Master of Science, International Institute of Management, University of Flensburg, Flensburg
Cited by
Jinger, D., Kumar, R., Kakade, V. D., Dinesh, D., Singh, G., Pande, V. C., Bhatnagar, P. R., Rao, B. K., Vishwakarma, A. K., Kumar, D., et al. (2022) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-022-09910-z · Cited by 99
The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review
Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96
Basavalingaiah, K., Paramesh, V., Parajuli, R., Girisha, H. C., Shivaprasad, M. K., Vidyashree, G. V., Thoma, G. J., Hanumanthappa, M., Yogesh, G. S., Dhar, S., et al. (2021) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106687 · Cited by 59
Phytotoxic Substances Involved in Teak Allelopathy and Agroforestry
Kato‐Noguchi, H. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11083314 · Cited by 27
Economic and Environmental Assessment of Olive Agroforestry Practices in Northern Greece
Tziolas, E., Ispikoudis, S., Mantzanas, K., Koutsoulis, D., & Pantera, A. (2022) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture12060851 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Doddabasawa, Chittapur, B. M., & Mahadeva Murthy, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Agricultural Sciences Raichur (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Doddabasawa
- Chittapur, B. M.
- ORCID
- Doddabasawa
- Venue
- Agroforestry Systems
- Published
- 2020-09-24
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2237-2247
- ISSN
- 0167-4366 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9680
- OpenAlex
- W3088450814
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
- Locations
- Agroforestry Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › African Botany and Ecology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- Azadirachta indica, Tectona grandis, energy use efficiency, economic analysis, benefit-cost ratio, semi-arid tropics, sustainability assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economics and energy potential of traditional agroforestry systems under contrasting ecosystems in semi arid tropics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10457-020-00545-y
- The paper
- Doddabasawa, Chittapur, B. M., & Mahadeva Murthy, M. (2020). Economics and energy potential of traditional agroforestry systems under contrasting ecosystems in semi arid tropics. Agroforestry Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00545-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
