Social media in health professional education: a student perspective on user levels and prospective applications
Abstract
Social Networking Sites (SNS) have seen exponential growth in recent years. The high utilisation of SNS by tertiary students makes them an attractive tool for educational institutions. This study aims to identify health professional students' use and behaviours with SNS, including students' perspectives on potential applications within health professional curricula. Students enrolled in an undergraduate physiotherapy program were invited to take part in an anonymous, online questionnaire at the end of 2012. The survey consisted of 20 items, gathering demographic data, information on current use of SNS, and opinions regarding the application of SNS into education. Both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered. A total of 142 students, from all years of study, completed the online questionnaire. Only two participants were not current users of social media. Facebook and YouTube had been utilised for educational purposes by 97 and 60 % of participants respectively; 85 % believed that SNS could benefit their learning experience. Only five respondents were not interested in following peers, academic staff, clinicians or professional associations on Facebook. Four key themes emerged: peer collaboration, need for separation between personal and professional realms, complimentary learning and enhanced communication. Students wish to make educational connections via SNS, yet expressed a strong desire to maintain privacy, and a distinction between personal and professional lives. Educational utilisation of SNS may improve communication speed and accessibility. Any educator involvement should be viewed with caution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Key strengths of health care students' informal use of social media for educational purposes include efficient communication with educators, peer collaboration, small group learning, and sharing resources.
“The results identified efficient communication with educators, peer collaboration, and small group learning and sharing resources as key strengths [133].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [133]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Maloney, S., Moss, A., & Ilic, D.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Maloney, Stephen
- ORCID
- Maloney, Stephen
- Venue
- Advances in Health Sciences Education
- Published
- 2014-02-25
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 687-697
- ISSN
- 1382-4996 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1677
- OpenAlex
- W2005327926
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Advances in Health Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- social networking sites, social media in education, health professions education, physiotherapy students, student perceptions, Facebook, YouTube, peer collaboration, personal and professional boundaries, privacy, educational communication
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Health Occupations, Physical Therapy Specialty, Young Adult, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review