Cited by 31Innovations in Medical EducationInnovative Education and Learning PracticesHealth and Medical Education

Can the tools of activity theory help us in advancing understanding and organisational change in undergraduate medical education?

Reid, Anne-Marie, Ledger, Alison, Kilminster, Sue, Fuller, Richard·2015·Advances in Health Sciences Education

Abstract

Continued changes to healthcare delivery in the UK, and an increasing focus on patient safety and quality improvement, require a radical rethink on how we enable graduates to begin work in challenging, complex environments. Professional regulatory bodies now require undergraduate medical schools to implement an 'assistantship' period in the final year of study, where senior medical students 'shadow' the work of junior doctors, with an expectation that they will be better 'prepared' for work. However, there is little guidance about what an 'assistantship' entails and the current emphasis on preparedness of students arguably underplays the importance of contextualised learning within the workplace environment. This paper will describe a modified Development Work Research (DWR) (Engeström in Developmental work research: activity theory in practice. Lehmanns Media, Berlin, 2005) approach to organisational change, enabling academic, clinical and administrative partners to develop assistantship placements in different hospitals. Our findings indicate that a modified DWR approach can reveal factors indicating organisational readiness to support change within a locally contextualised framework. The process has significant practical applications across a range of healthcare disciplines, as all professions seek to engage with the challenge of enabling successful transitions of graduates to the workplace.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10459-014-9553-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 31

Authors
Reid, A.-M., Ledger, A., Kilminster, S., & Fuller, R.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Reid, Anne-Marie
Venue
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Published
2014-10-08
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
655-668
ISSN
  • 1382-4996 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1677
OpenAlex
W1980483802
Cited by
31
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
11.97
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
activity theory, organizational change, undergraduate medical education, transition to practice, contextual learning, workplace learning, graduate preparedness, organizational readiness
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Undergraduate, United Kingdom, Models, Theoretical, Organizational Innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review