The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From “old school” to “farm-to-school”: Neoliberalization from the ground up
Open accessAbstract
Farm-to-school (FTS) programs have garnered the attentions and energies of people in a diverse array of social locations in the food system and are serving as a sort of touchstone for many in the alternative agrifood movement. Yet, unlike other alternative agrifood initiatives, FTS programs intersect directly with the long-established institution of the welfare state, including its vestiges of New Deal farm programs and public entitlement. This paper explores how FTS is navigating the liminal terrain of public and private initiative, particularly the ways in which it interfaces with neoliberalism as both a material and discursive project. It examines the political emergence of school food programs and finds that FTS is strikingly similar to traditional school programs in objectives, but differs in approach. Yet, in their efforts to fill in the gaps created by political and economic neoliberalization, FTS advocates are in essence producing neoliberal forms and practices afresh. These include those associated with contingent labor relationships, private funding sources, and the devolution of responsibility to the local, all of which have serious consequences for social equity. The paper also discusses how FTS programs are employing the rhetoric of neoliberal governmentality, including personal responsibility and individual success, consumerism, and choice. While these may be tactical choices used to secure funding in a competitive environment, they may also contribute to the normalization of neoliberalism, further circumscribing the possibilities of what can be imagined and created to solve social problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Governmentality: power and rule in modern society
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6521 · Cited by 6,205
Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00247 · Cited by 3,670
The Audit Society: Rituals of VerificationPreprint
Power, M. (1999) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 3,596
The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification
Quam, L. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7133.787a · Cited by 3,575
The twilight of equality?: neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-6822 · Cited by 2,988
Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State–Theoretical Perspective
Jessop, B. (2002) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00250 · Cited by 1,459
Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism
McCarthy, J., & Prudham, S. (2004) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.003 · Cited by 1,033
Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health
Kushi, L. H., & Nestle, M. (2003) · Journal of Public Health Policy · doi:10.2307/3343179 · Cited by 1,009
Agrarian dreams: the paradox of organic farming in California
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-2793 · Cited by 1,007
Allen, P., FitzSimmons, M., Goodman, M., & Warner, K. (2003) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/s0743-0167(02)00047-5 · Cited by 640
Self-citation
Cited by
Quality Food, Public Procurement, and Sustainable Development: The School Meal Revolution in Rome
Sonnino, R. (2009) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a40112 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, P., & Guthman, J.
- Venue
- Agriculture and Human Values
- Published
- 2006-11-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 401-415
- ISSN
- 0889-048X (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8366
- OpenAlex
- W2000910612
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 51.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From “old school” to “farm-to-school”: Neoliberalization from the ground up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10460-006-9019-z
- The paper
- Allen, P., & Guthman, J. (2006). From “old school” to “farm-to-school”: Neoliberalization from the ground up. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9019-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.