The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining Attributes and Metrics of Effective Research Mentoring Relationships
Open accessAbstract
Despite evidence of mentoring’s importance in training researchers, studies to date have not yet determined which mentoring relationships have the most impact and what specific factors in those mentoring relationships contribute to key outcomes, such as the commitment to and persistence in research career paths for emerging researchers from diverse populations. Efforts to broaden participation and persistence in biomedical research careers require an understanding of why and how mentoring relationships work and their impact, not only to research training but also to promoting career advancement. This paper proposes core attributes of effective mentoring relationships, as supported by the literature and suggested by theoretical models of academic persistence. In addition, both existing and developing metrics for measuring the effectiveness of these attributes within mentoring relationships across diverse groups are presented, as well as preliminary data on these metrics from the authors’ work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 9,020
Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth
Yosso *, T. J. (2005) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/1361332052000341006 · Cited by 8,663
Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 · Cited by 7,715
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433
Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20173 · Cited by 1,324
Undergraduate Student-Faculty Research Partnerships Affect Studen Retention
Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998) · The Review of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/rhe.1998.0016 · Cited by 724
Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020743 · Cited by 546
Chang, M. J., Eagan, M. K., Lin, M. H., & Hurtado, S. (2011) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/jhe.2011.0030 · Cited by 330
Self-citationWilliams, M. M., & George-Jackson, C. E. (2014) · Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2014004477 · Cited by 127
Cited by
Atkins, K., Dougan, B. M., Dromgold-Sermen, M. S., Potter, H., Sathy, V., & Panter, A. T. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00242-3 · Cited by 227
A Mentor, Advisor, and Coach (MAC) Program to Enhance the Resident and Mentor Experience
Patel, D., Windish, D., & Hay, S. (2020) · MedEdPORTAL · doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11005 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfund, C., Byars-Winston, A., Branchaw, J., Hurtado, S., & Eagan, K.
- Venue
- AIDS and Behavior
- Published
- 2016-04-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- 238-248
- ISSN
- 1090-7165 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3254
- OpenAlex
- W2320109070
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 36.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining Attributes and Metrics of Effective Research Mentoring Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10461-016-1384-z
- The paper
- Pfund, C., Byars-Winston, A., Branchaw, J., Hurtado, S., & Eagan, K. (2016). Defining Attributes and Metrics of Effective Research Mentoring Relationships. AIDS and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1384-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
