Cited by 134Forecasting Techniques and ApplicationsTime Series Analysis and ForecastingData Mining and Machine Learning Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A survey of machine learning techniques for food sales prediction

Tsoumakas, Grigorios·2019·Artificial Intelligence Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10462-018-9637-z

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 134

Metadata

Authors
Tsoumakas, G.
Affiliations
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Tsoumakas, Grigorios
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2018-06-14
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
441-447
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W2808163457
Cited by
134
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
supermarket inventory management, stockouts, feature selection, forecasting accuracy evaluation, food industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review