Cited by 841Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningTopic ModelingHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Sentiment analysis using deep learning architectures: a review

Yadav, Ashima, Vishwakarma, Dinesh Kumar·2020·Artificial Intelligence Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10462-019-09794-5

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yadav, A., & Vishwakarma, D. K.
Affiliations
Delhi Technological University (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Yadav, Ashima
  • Vishwakarma, Dinesh Kumar
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2019-12-02
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
4335-4385
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W2993843842
Cited by
841
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 160 · 2023: 196 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 31
FWCI
34.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
sentiment analysis, deep learning architectures, social media, multilingual sentiment analysis, sentiment datasets, unstructured text

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review