Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 262 of the 262 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

YOLO advances to its genesis: a decadal and comprehensive review of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) series

Open access
Sapkota, Ranjan, Flores-Calero, Marco, Qureshi, Rizwan, Badgujar, Chetan, Nepal, Upesh, Poulose, Alwin, Zeno, Peter, Vaddevolu, Uday Bhanu Prakash, Khan, Sheheryar, Shoman, Maged, Yan, Hong, Karkee, Manoj·2025·Artificial Intelligence Review

Abstract

This review systematically examines the progression of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) object detection algorithms from YOLOv1 to the recently unveiled YOLOv12. Employing a reverse chronological analysis, this study examines the advancements introduced by YOLO algorithms, beginning with YOLOv12 and progressing through YOLO11 (or YOLOv11), YOLOv10, YOLOv9, YOLOv8, and subsequent versions to explore each version’s contributions to enhancing speed, detection accuracy, and computational efficiency in real-time object detection. Additionally, this study reviews the alternative versions derived from YOLO architectural advancements of YOLO-NAS, YOLO-X, YOLO-R, DAMO-YOLO, and Gold-YOLO. Moreover, the study highlights the transformative impact of YOLO models across five critical application areas: autonomous vehicles and traffic safety, healthcare and medical imaging, industrial manufacturing, surveillance and security, and agriculture. By detailing the incremental technological advancements in subsequent YOLO versions, this review chronicles the evolution of YOLO, and discusses the challenges and limitations in each of the earlier versions. The evolution signifies a path towards integrating YOLO with multimodal, context-aware, and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems for the next YOLO decade, promising significant implications for future developments in AI-driven applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10462-025-11253-3

Cites

262 of 262 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 262 references

Metadata

Authors
Sapkota, R., Flores-Calero, M., Qureshi, R., Badgujar, C., Nepal, U., Poulose, A., Zeno, P., Vaddevolu, U. B. P., Khan, S., Shoman, M., Yan, H., & Karkee, M.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2025-06-11
Volume
58
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W4400266963
Cited by
308
References
262
FWCI
112.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: YOLO advances to its genesis: a decadal and comprehensive review of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10462-025-11253-3
The paper
Sapkota, R., Flores-Calero, M., Qureshi, R., Badgujar, C., Nepal, U., Poulose, A., Zeno, P., Vaddevolu, U. B. P., Khan, S., Shoman, M., Yan, H., & Karkee, M. (2025). YOLO advances to its genesis: a decadal and comprehensive review of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) series. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11253-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.