Cited by 32Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningPsychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience

Agentic AI systems in the age of generative models: architectures, cloud scalability, and real-world applications

Open access
Alva, Linga Reddy, Pandey, Bishwajeet·2026·Artificial Intelligence Review

Abstract

This research proposes a holistic agentic Artificial Intelligence framework that seeks to solve the palpable requirement of autonomy, versatility, and world-scale generative Artificial Intelligence systems. When framing the concept of an agentic Artificial Intelligence as a paradigm shift where Large Language Models are relatively reactive, tool-augmented to a proactive, modular agent that pursues goals in the long term, the research discusses how large language models are becoming an architectural mandate. The proposed research uses a skillful literature synthesis and develops a concept and technical framework that integrates perception, memory, planning, execution, and communication modules. In contrast to current frameworks like AutoGPT and ReAct, where the deep memory, explainability, and certain control of scalability are often lacking, the proposed framework offers a solution with persistent memory layers, semantic routing, and modular orchestration pipelines when it comes to cloud-native deployments. Experimental verification offers a greater degree of autonomy, coordination, and resilience in a diverse range of activities such as enterprise automation and robotics. It is also an edge deployment with the help of lightweight microservices framework. In practice, this method supports scaled, comprehensible agents adapted to long-loop thinking and human-in-the-loop management and adaptive value chain serving. The novelty of the work is attributed to its reusable architecture, as it is not only capable of modifying agentic behavior alone, but it can also connect the theoretical principles and industry feasibility. Future efforts will be with the integration of ethical governance, uniform benchmarking, and multimodal memory remodeling in next generation of real-world autonomous systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10462-025-11458-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 32

Authors
Alva, L. R., & Pandey, B.
Affiliations
G.L. Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management Greater Noida (IN)
Corresponding author
Pandey, Bishwajeet
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2026-01-12
Volume
59
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W7122857583
Cited by
32
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 32
FWCI
109.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Keywords
agentic AI, large language models, autonomous agents, agent architecture, persistent memory, semantic routing, cloud scalability, cloud-native deployment, edge deployment, microservices, enterprise automation, robotics, human-in-the-loop, long-term planning, explainability, React

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review