The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward an Evidence‐Based System for Innovation Support for Implementing Innovations with Quality: Tools, Training, Technical Assistance, and Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement
Abstract
An individual or organization that sets out to implement an innovation (e.g., a new technology, program, or policy) generally requires support. In the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation, a Support System should work with Delivery Systems (national, state and/or local entities such as health and human service organizations, community‐based organizations, schools) to enhance their capacity for quality implementation of innovations. The literature on the Support ystem has been under‐researched and under‐developed. This article begins to conceptualize theory, research, and action for an evidence‐based system for innovation support (EBSIS). EBSIS describes key priorities for strengthening the science and practice of support. The major goal of EBSIS is to enhance the research and practice of support in order to build capacity in the Delivery System for implementing innovations with quality, and thereby, help the Delivery System achieve outcomes. EBSIS is guided by a logic model that includes four key support components: tools, training, technical assistance, and quality assurance/quality improvement . EBSIS uses the Getting To Outcomes approach to accountability to aid the identification and synthesis of concepts, tools, and evidence for support. We conclude with some discussion of the current status of EBSIS and possible next steps, including the development of collaborative researcher‐practitioner‐funder‐consumer partnerships to accelerate accumulation of knowledge on the Support System. Special Issue: Advances in Bridging Research and Practice Using the Interactive System Framework for Dissemination and Implementation; Guest Editors: Abraham Wandersman, Paul Flaspohler, Catherine A. Lesesne, Richard Puddy; Action Editor: Emilie Phillips Smith
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While some studies have found improved outcomes with a bundle of strategies that were uniquely combined or a standardized package of strategies (e.g., Replicating Effective Programs [59, 60] and Getting To Outcomes [61, 62])”
From A systematic review of experimentally tested implementation strategies across health and human service settings: evidence from 2010-2022 (2024) · cites this paper as [62]
In the citing paper
“Targets levels of individual and processes”
From Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice (2017) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Motivation and capability to engage in implementation process strategies(in general, not related to a specific EBI)”
From Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice (2017) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Individual and collective self-efficacy and motivation to engage in implementation process strategiesTeam completion of implementation process strategies”
From Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice (2017) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0 · Cited by 5,304
Whiting, P., Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. M., & Kleijnen, J. (2003) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25 · Cited by 3,592
Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations
Grimshaw, J., & Russell, I. T. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n · Cited by 2,791
Student achievement through staff development
Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (1988) · Cited by 2,100
AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment
Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00043-5 · Cited by 1,611
Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes
Hall, G. E., Hord, S. M., Joyce, B. R., & Anderson, S. (2000) · Cited by 1,547
Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., Blachman, M., Dunville, R., & Saul, J. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z · Cited by 1,339
Self-citationTechniques for Evaluating Training Programs
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1975) · Training and development journal · Cited by 1,234
The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right
Gawande, A. A. (2011) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(15)30310-0 · Cited by 1,213
Core Implementation Components
Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731509335549 · Cited by 1,103
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Blumenthal B, 2003, Investing in capacity building: A guide to high-impact approaches
- Cowley K, 2010, Capacity building technical assistance
- Drucker P, 2008, Classic drucker: Essential wisdom of Peter Drucker
- Keener D. C. (2007). Toward a science of capacity building: An examination of technical assistance following a training program for prevention professionals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA.
- Knowles MS, 1970, The modern practice of adult education: Andrology versus pedagogy
- Wandersman A, 2008, Illuminating the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation, Special issue of the American Journal of Community Psychology, 82, 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process
Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (2012) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x · Cited by 1,102
Self-citationLeeman, J., Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Rohweder, C., & Shea, C. M. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x · Cited by 544
The Handbook of Behavior Change
Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. E., & Lintunen, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318 · Cited by 446
A PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE HEURISTIC FOR ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS: R = MC 2
Scaccia, J., Cook, B. S., Lamont, A. E., Wandersman, A., Castellow, J., Katz, J., & Beidas, R. S. (2015) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.21698 · Cited by 414
Self-citationChanging Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.002 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Wandersman, A., Chien, V. H., & Katz, J.
- Affiliations
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wandersman, Abraham
- ORCID
- Wandersman, Abraham
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04-27
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 445-459
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- OpenAlex
- W2159762301
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 31.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- innovation support, implementation research, Interactive Systems Framework, delivery systems, quality assurance, quality improvement, technical assistance, training, implementation tools, accountability, research-practice collaboration, capacity building
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Organizational Innovation, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Models, Organizational, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
