Youth as Partners, Participants or Passive Recipients: A Review of Children and Adolescents in Community‐Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
Abstract
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an orientation to research that places value on equitable collaborations between community members and academic partners, reflecting shared decision making throughout the research process. Although CBPR has become increasingly popular for research with adults, youth are less likely to be included as partners. In our review of the literature, we identified 399 articles described by author or MeSH keyword as CBPR related to youth. We analyzed each study to determine youth engagement. Not including misclassified articles, 27 % of percent of studies were community-placed but lacked a community partnership and/or participatory component. Only 56 (15 %) partnered with youth in some phase of the research process. Although youth were most commonly involved in identifying research questions/priorities and in designing/conducting research, most youth-partnered projects included children or adolescents in several phases of the research process. We outline content, methodology, phases of youth partnership, and age of participating youth in each CBPR with youth project, provide exemplars of CBPR with youth, and discuss the state of the youth-partnered research literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Findings generated from CBPR are collaborative and therefore more culturally relevant to those involved.
“Findings generated from CBPR are collaborative and therefore more culturally relevant to those involved (Atalay, 2012; Jacquez, Vaughn, & Wagner, 2013).”
From Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada (2021) · cites this paper as Jacquez, Vaughn, & Wagner, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 99 · Cited by 471
- Authors
- Jacquez, F., Vaughn, L. M., & Wagner, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jacquez, Farrah
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-21
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 176-189
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- OpenAlex
- W2050646317
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000077)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Keywords
- community-based participatory research, youth participation, children and adolescents, university-community collaboration, shared decision-making, research design, research priorities
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review