The Structure of social exchange in self-help support groups: Development of a measure
Open accessAbstract
Self‐help support groups are indigenous community resources designed to help people manage a variety of personal challenges, from alcohol abuse to xeroderma pigmentosum. The social exchanges that occur during group meetings are central to understanding how people benefit from participation. This paper examines the different types of social exchange behaviors that occur during meetings, using two studies to develop empirically distinct scales that reliably measure theoretically important types of exchange. Resource theory informed the initial measurement development efforts. Exploratory factor analyses from the first study led to revisions in the factor structure of the social exchange scales. The revised measure captured the exchange of emotional support, experiential information, humor, unwanted behaviors, and exchanges outside meetings. Confirmatory factor analyses from a follow‐up study with a different sample of self‐help support groups provided good model fit, suggesting the revised structure accurately represented the data. Further, the scales demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity with related constructs. Future research can use the scales to identify aspects of social exchange that are most important in improving health outcomes among self‐help support group participants. Groups can use the scales in practice to celebrate strengths and address weaknesses in their social exchange dynamics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Social Exchange and Support Measure demonstrates good model fit with theoretical constructs and shows evidence in support of its convergent and discriminant validity.
“The measure demonstrates good model fit with theoretical constructs and shows evidence in support of it convergent and discriminant validity.”
From Horticultural therapy program for people with mental illness: A mixed-method evaluation (2020) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Brown, L. D., Tang, X., & Hollman, R. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Texas School of Public Health 1101 N. Campbell, Room 409 79902 El Paso TX USA
- SHARE! the Self-Help And Recovery Exchange Los Angeles CA USA
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Louis D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 83-95
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- PMC
- PMC4012643
- OpenAlex
- W2018010633
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (U54CA153505)
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P20MD002287)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Keywords
- social exchange, social exchange theory, measurement development, emotional support, experiential information, humor, unwanted behavior, group meetings, scale development, factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review