Collaborative Measurement Development as a Tool in CBPR: Measurement Development and Adaptation within the Cultures of Communities
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the processes we engaged into develop a measurement protocol used to assess the outcomes in a community based suicide and alcohol abuse prevention project with two Alaska Native communities. While the literature on community-based participatory research (CBPR) is substantial regarding the importance of collaborations, few studies have reported on this collaboration in the process of developing measures to assess CBPR projects. We first tell a story of the processes around the standard issues of doing cross-cultural work on measurement development related to areas of equivalence. A second story is provided that highlights how community differences within the same cultural group can affect both the process and content of culturally relevant measurement selection, adaptation, and development.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CBPR approaches have demonstrated how interventions can be culturally adapted while maintaining adequate fidelity and enhancing intervention efficacy.
“CBPR approaches have demonstrated how interventions can be culturally adapted while maintaining adequate fidelity and enhancing intervention efficacy [50].”
From Centering Diverse Communities within Mindful Parenting Interventions in the U.S.: A Narrative Literature Review (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
The Abstract and Conclusion describe using CBPR to adapt measures for assessing a cultural intervention, not adapting the intervention itself. The passages found when searching for intervention fidelity and efficacy do not report whether adaptation maintained fidelity or improved efficacy; the paper says the intervention was described in subsequent papers. No page numbers were supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Gonzalez, J., & Trickett, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Bemidji State University (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gonzalez, John
- ORCID
- Trickett, Edison J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-19
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 112-124
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- PMC
- PMC4158449
- OpenAlex
- W2031653763
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA016098, R01AA011446)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA037183)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P30GM103325)
- National Center for Research Resources (P20RR061430, P20RR016430)
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R24MD001626)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- community-based participatory research, measurement development, cross-cultural measurement, Alaska Native communities, suicide prevention, alcoholism prevention, outcome measurement, cultural relevance, community collaboration
- MeSH terms
- Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Alaska, Alcoholism, Cooperative Behavior, Inuit, Humans, Language, Suicide, Translations, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cultural Competency, Community-Based Participatory Research, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
