The Long Arm of Mentoring: A Counterfactual Analysis of Natural Youth Mentoring and Employment Outcomes in Early Careers
Abstract
Young people often develop natural mentoring relationships with nonparental adults during adolescence and young adulthood. While much has been learned about the benefits of natural mentoring for more proximate outcomes such as mental health and education, relatively little is known about the causal impact of youth mentoring relationships on career opportunities. This study uses data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) survey to explore the effects of different kinds of natural mentoring relationships on employment outcomes during the early career years (when workers are in their late twenties and early thirties). Whereas traditional methods of causal conditioning show a broad range of employment benefits from being mentored, results from counterfactual analysis using propensity score matching reveal that the benefits of mentoring are confined to intrinsic job rewards. The findings imply that mentors help steer youth toward intrinsically rewarding careers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings are in line with a study on natural mentoring characteristics, showing the benefits of relationships with natural mentors outside the family by building new (bridging) forms of social capital.
“The findings are in line with a study on natural mentoring characteristics (DuBois & Silverthorn, 2005b), showing the benefits of relationships with natural mentors outside the family by building new (bridging) forms of social capital (McDonald & Lambert, 2014; Raposa et al., 2017).”
From Does Natural Mentoring Matter? A Multilevel Meta‐analysis on the Association Between Natural Mentoring and Youth Outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as McDonald & Lambert, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- McDonald, S., & Lambert, J.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McDonald, Steve
- ORCID
- McDonald, Steve
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-22
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 262-273
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- OpenAlex
- W1971651340
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01- HD31921, P01HD031921)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
- Keywords
- natural mentoring, youth mentoring, employment effects, early career, career choice, adolescent development, Add Health
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Career Choice, Child, Employment, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mentors, Causality, Young Adult, Propensity Score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review