Cited by 51Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentCareer Development and DiversityHigher Education and Employability

The Long Arm of Mentoring: A Counterfactual Analysis of Natural Youth Mentoring and Employment Outcomes in Early Careers

McDonald, Steve, Lambert, Joshua·2014·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Young people often develop natural mentoring relationships with nonparental adults during adolescence and young adulthood. While much has been learned about the benefits of natural mentoring for more proximate outcomes such as mental health and education, relatively little is known about the causal impact of youth mentoring relationships on career opportunities. This study uses data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) survey to explore the effects of different kinds of natural mentoring relationships on employment outcomes during the early career years (when workers are in their late twenties and early thirties). Whereas traditional methods of causal conditioning show a broad range of employment benefits from being mentored, results from counterfactual analysis using propensity score matching reveal that the benefits of mentoring are confined to intrinsic job rewards. The findings imply that mentors help steer youth toward intrinsically rewarding careers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10464-014-9670-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings are in line with a study on natural mentoring characteristics, showing the benefits of relationships with natural mentors outside the family by building new (bridging) forms of social capital.

    “The findings are in line with a study on natural mentoring characteristics (DuBois & Silverthorn, 2005b), showing the benefits of relationships with natural mentors outside the family by building new (bridging) forms of social capital (McDonald & Lambert, 2014; Raposa et al., 2017).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 51

Authors
McDonald, S., & Lambert, J.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
McDonald, Steve
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-22
Volume
54
Issue
3-4
Pages
262-273
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W1971651340
Cited by
51
References
83
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01- HD31921, P01HD031921)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
natural mentoring, youth mentoring, employment effects, early career, career choice, adolescent development, Add Health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Career Choice, Child, Employment, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mentors, Causality, Young Adult, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review