Cited by 69Homelessness and Social IssuesChild Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Longitudinal impact of a family critical time intervention on children in high-risk families experiencing homelessness: a randomized trial

Open access
Shinn, Marybeth, Samuels, Judith, Fischer, Sean N., Thompkins, Amanda, Fowler, Patrick J.·2015·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

A randomized trial compared effects of a Family Critical Time Intervention (FCTI) to usual care for children in 200 newly homeless families in which mothers had diagnosable mental illness or substance problems. Adapted from an evidence‐based practice to prevent chronic homelessness for adults with mental illnesses, FCTI combines housing and structured, time‐limited case management to connect families leaving shelter with community services. Families were followed at five time points over 24 months. Data on 311 children—99 ages 1.5–5 years, 113 ages 6–10 years, and 99 ages 11–16 years—included mother‐, teacher‐, and child‐reports of mental health, school experiences, and psychosocial well‐being. Analyses used hierarchical linear modeling to investigate intervention effects and changes in child functioning over time. Referral to FCTI reduced internalizing and externalizing problems in preschool‐aged children and externalizing for adolescents 11–16. The intervention led to declines in self‐reported school troubles for children 6–10 and 11–16. Both experimental and control children in all age groups showed reductions in symptoms over time. Although experimental results were scattered, they suggest that FCTI has the potential to improve mental health and school outcomes for children experiencing homelessness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10464-015-9742-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with Treatment First, Housing First programs improved housing stability by a median of 41% (IQI 18% to 166%).

    “Housing First programs improved housing stability when compared with Treatment First7,25,30,32-34 (median increase of 41%, IQI: 18% to 166%)”

    From Permanent Supportive Housing with Housing First to Reduce Homelessness and Promote Health among Homeless Populations with Disability: A Community Guide Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results (Sample Description and Housing Experiences; page unavailable) report that families assigned to Family Critical Time Intervention spent more time in community housing than families receiving usual care, particularly during the first nine months. The paper does not compare Housing First with Treatment First or report a median 41% increase (IQI 18%–166%). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Shinn et al., children ages 6-10 and 11-16 receiving the family-adapted critical time intervention compared to usual care were less likely at 24-month follow-up to self-report school troubles.

    “Children ages 6–10 and 11–16 receiving the intervention compared to usual care were less likely at 24-month follow-up to self-report school troubles”
  • In Shinn et al., youth in both usual care and family-adapted critical time intervention exhibited reductions in psychosocial and mental health symptoms over time.

    “Youth in both groups exhibited reductions in psychosocial and mental health symptoms over time.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 69

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rickel AU Biasatti LL 1982 Modification of the block child rearing practices report Journal of Clinical Psychology 38 129 134

Authors
Shinn, M., Samuels, J., Fischer, S. N., Thompkins, A., & Fowler, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Shinn, Marybeth
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-04
Volume
56
Issue
3-4
Pages
205-216
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W1118703902
Cited by
69
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1 R01 MH0671484)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
homeless children, high-risk families, maternal mental illness, maternal substance use, case management, housing assistance, child mental health, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, school problems, psychosocial well-being, preschool children, adolescents, community service
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Community Mental Health Services, Depression, Family Therapy, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Infant, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, New York, Public Housing, Schools, Social Behavior Disorders, Parenting, Homeless Youth, Case Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review