Cited by 76Cognitive Science and MappingMulti-Criteria Decision MakingComplex Systems and Decision Making

Big data-driven fuzzy cognitive map for prioritising IT service procurement in the public sector

Open access
Choi, Youngseok, Lee, Habin, Irani, Zahir·2018·Annals of Operations Research

Abstract

The prevalence of big data is starting to spread across the public and private sectors however, an impediment to its widespread adoption orientates around a lack of appropriate big data analytics (BDA) and resulting skills to exploit the full potential of big data availability. In this paper, we propose a novel BDA to contribute towards this void, using a fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) approach that will enhance decision-making thus prioritising IT service procurement in the public sector. This is achieved through the development of decision models that capture the strengths of both data analytics and the established intuitive qualitative approach . By taking advantages of both data analytics and FCM, the proposed approach captures the strength of data-driven decision-making and intuitive model-driven decision modelling. This approach is then validated through a decision-making case regarding IT service procurement in public sector, which is the fundamental step of IT infrastructure supply for publics in a regional government in the Russia federation. The analysis result for the given decision-making problem is then evaluated by decision makers and e-government expertise to confirm the applicability of the proposed BDA. In doing so, demonstrating the value of this approach in contributing towards robust public decision-making regarding IT service procurement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10479-016-2281-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 76

Authors
Choi, Y., Lee, H., & Irani, Z.
Affiliations
Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Lee, Habin
Venue
Annals of Operations Research
Published
2016-08-17
Volume
270
Issue
1-2
Pages
75-104
ISSN
  • 0254-5330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9338
OpenAlex
W2511500480
Cited by
76
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Operations Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Bradford Scholars (University of Bradford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
EU (612133)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
Keywords
big data analytics, fuzzy cognitive maps, IT service procurement, public sector decision-making, e-government, decision models, regional government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review