The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organization design: an information processing view
Galbraith, J. R. (1974) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28 · Cited by 2,451
Information Processing, Knowledge Development, and Strategic Supply Chain Performance
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/20159575 · Cited by 813
Cited by
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03683-9 · Cited by 419
Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological framework
Kochan, C. G., & Nowicki, D. R. (2018) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2017-0099 · Cited by 319
Supply chain resilience: new challenges and opportunities
Shi, X., Liu, W., & Lim, M. K. (2024) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2023.2262396 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- DuHadway, S., Carnovale, S., & Hazen, B.
- Venue
- Annals of Operations Research
- Published
- 2017-03-02
- Volume
- 283
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 179-198
- ISSN
- 0254-5330 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9338
- OpenAlex
- W2592523239
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10479-017-2452-0
- The paper
- DuHadway, S., Carnovale, S., & Hazen, B. (2019). Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2452-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
