Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examining sustainable supply chain management of SMEs using resource based view and institutional theory

Shibin, K. T., Dubey, Rameshwar, Gunasekaran, Angappa, Hazen, Benjamin, Roubaud, David, Gupta, Shivam, Foropon, Cyril·2020·Annals of Operations Research
DOI 10.1007/s10479-017-2706-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10479-017-2706-x

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 164 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Chen, I. J., & Small, M. H. (1996). Planning for advanced manufacturing technology: A research framework. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(5), 4–24. · doi:10.1108/01443579610113915
  2. Crook, T. R., & Esper, T. L. (2014). Do resources aid in supply chain functioning and management? Yes, but more (and more precise) research is needed. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 94–97. · doi:10.1111/jscm.12055
  3. Daugherty, P. J., Ellinger, A. E., & Rogers, D. S. (1995). Information accessibility: Customer responsiveness and enhanced performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 25(1), 4–17. · doi:10.1108/09600039510080117
  4. Dillman, D. A. (2011). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method-2007 update with new internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. London: Wiley.
  5. Foss, N. J., & Eriksen, B. (1995). Competitive advantage and industry capabilities. In Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Towards a synthesis (pp. 43–69). Springer US.
  6. Garbie, I. H. (2014). An analytical technique to model and assess sustainable development index in manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Production Research, 52(16), 4876–4915. · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.893066
  7. Ireland, R., & Bruce, R. (2000). CPFR: Only the beginning of collaboration. Supply Chain Management Review, 4(4), 80–88.
  8. Jindal, A., & Sangwan, K. S. (2016). Multi-objective fuzzy mathematical modelling of closed-loop supply chain considering economical and environmental factors. Annals of Operations Research, pp. 1–26.
  9. Massaroni, E., Cozzolino, A., & Wankowicz, E. (2016). Sustainability reporting of logistics service providers in Europe. International Journal of Environment and Health, 8(1), 38–58. · doi:10.1504/ijenvh.2016.077662
  10. Miri-Lavassani, K., Movahedi, B., & Kumar, V. (2009). Developments in theories of supply chain management: The case of B2B electronic marketplace adoption. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 9(6), 85–98.
  11. Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric testing. New York: McGraw.
  12. Sabath, R. E., & Frentzel, D. G. (1997). Go for growth! Supply chain management’s role in growing revenues. Supply Chain Management Review, 1(2), 16–23.
  13. Saunders, M. J. (1995). Chains, pipelines, networks and value stream: the role, nature and value of such metaphors in forming perceptions of the task of purchasing and supply management. In First Worldwide research symposium on purchasing and supply chain management Tempe, Arizona (March) (pp. 476–485).
  14. Saunders, M. J. (1998). The comparative analysis of supply chains and implications for the development of strategies. In Seventh international IPSERA conference (Vol. 477).
  15. Stank, T. P., Daugherty, P. J., & Ellinger, A. E. (1999). Marketing/logistics integration and firm performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 10(1), 11–24. · doi:10.1108/09574099910805905
  16. Sutton, M. J. (1997). The role of electronic data interchange in the transportation industry (I). Defense Transportation Journal, 53, 20.
  17. Toptal, A., & Çetinkaya, B. (2017). How supply chain coordination affects the environment: A carbon footprint perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 250(2), 487–519. · doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1858-9
  18. Waldo, D., Jaques, E., Kilman, R. H., Pondy, L. R., Slevin, D. P., Kilman, R. H., et al. (1978). Organization theory: Revisiting the elephant. Public Administration Review, 38(6), 589–597. · doi:10.2307/976043
  19. Yeung, A. C. L., Lee, T. S., & Chan, L. Y. (2003). Senior management perspectives and ISO 9000 effectiveness: An empirical research. International Journal of Production Research, 41(3), 545–569. · doi:10.1080/0020754021000033896

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Shibin, K. T., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Hazen, B., Roubaud, D., Gupta, S., & Foropon, C.
Venue
Annals of Operations Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-11-13
Volume
290
Issue
1-2
Pages
301-326
ISSN
  • 0254-5330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9338
DOI
10.1007/s10479-017-2706-x
OpenAlex
W2770627055
Cited by
294
References
164
FWCI
13.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining sustainable supply chain management of SMEs using resource based view and institutional theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10479-017-2706-x
The paper
Shibin, K. T., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Hazen, B., Roubaud, D., Gupta, S., & Foropon, C. (2020). Examining sustainable supply chain management of SMEs using resource based view and institutional theory. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2706-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.