Cited by 135Empathy and Medical EducationPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAction Observation and Synchronization

The effect of emotional distance on psychophysiologic concordance and perceived empathy between patient and interviewer.

Marci, Carl D., Orr, Scott P.·2006·Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

Abstract

This preliminary study investigated the effect of emotional distance on psychophysiologic concordance and perceived empathy in a clinical population. Participants included 20 adult outpatients from a mental health clinic that underwent a brief semi-structured interview with a trained psychiatrist in either an emotionally neutral or an emotionally distant condition. Simultaneous skin conductance (SC) levels of the patient and interviewer were recorded and used to calculate a measure of psychophysiologic concordance. Interviewer gaze was rated by an independent observer and used as a proxy indicator of emotional distance. Observer ratings of interviewer gaze, SC concordance, and patient ratings of perceived interviewer empathy were significantly lower in the emotionally distant condition compared with the emotionally neutral condition (p < 0.05). Results suggest that increased emotional distance is associated with decreased psychophysiologic concordance and reduced subjective ratings of perceived empathy. The observed differences in psychophysiologic concordance support the use of this measure as a potential marker of empathy in a clinical population in an interview setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10484-006-9008-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 135

Authors
Marci, C. D., & Orr, S. P.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Marci, Carl D.
Venue
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
Published
2006-05-25
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
115-128
ISSN
  • 0363-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1090-0586
  • 1573-3270
OpenAlex
W2110232674
Cited by
135
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH072073)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
emotional distance, perceived empathy, skin conductance, clinical interview
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Sex Characteristics, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review