Cited by 248EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Biofeedback for Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review

Schoenberg, Poppy L. A., David, Anthony S.·2014·Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

Abstract

Biofeedback potentially provides non-invasive, effective psychophysiological interventions for psychiatric disorders. The encompassing purpose of this review was to establish how biofeedback interventions have been used to treat select psychiatric disorders [anxiety, autistic spectrum disorders, depression, dissociation, eating disorders, schizophrenia and psychoses] to date and provide a useful reference for consultation by clinicians and researchers planning to administer a biofeedback treatment. A systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and WOK databases and hand searches in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, and Journal of Neurotherapy, identified 227 articles; 63 of which are included within this review. Electroencephalographic neurofeedback constituted the most investigated modality (31.7%). Anxiety disorders were the most commonly treated (68.3%). Multi-modal biofeedback appeared most effective in significantly ameliorating symptoms, suggesting that targeting more than one physiological modality for bio-regulation increases therapeutic efficacy. Overall, 80.9% of articles reported some level of clinical amelioration related to biofeedback exposure, 65.0% to a statistically significant (p < .05) level of symptom reduction based on reported standardized clinical parameters. Although the heterogeneity of the included studies warrants caution before explicit efficacy statements can be made. Further development of standardized controlled methodological protocols tailored for specific disorders and guidelines to generate comprehensive reports may contribute towards establishing the value of biofeedback interventions within mainstream psychiatry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10484-014-9246-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 248

Authors
Schoenberg, P. L. A., & David, A. S.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Schoenberg, Poppy L. A.
Venue
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
Published
2014-05-08
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
109-135
ISSN
  • 0363-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1090-0586
  • 1573-3270
OpenAlex
W2047050658
Cited by
248
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/J004162/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
biofeedback, mental illness, anxiety disorders, autism spectrum disorder, depression, dissociation, eating disorders, schizophrenia, psychosis, symptom relief, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Mental Disorders, Biofeedback, Psychology, Humans, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review