Biofeedback for Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Biofeedback potentially provides non-invasive, effective psychophysiological interventions for psychiatric disorders. The encompassing purpose of this review was to establish how biofeedback interventions have been used to treat select psychiatric disorders [anxiety, autistic spectrum disorders, depression, dissociation, eating disorders, schizophrenia and psychoses] to date and provide a useful reference for consultation by clinicians and researchers planning to administer a biofeedback treatment. A systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and WOK databases and hand searches in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, and Journal of Neurotherapy, identified 227 articles; 63 of which are included within this review. Electroencephalographic neurofeedback constituted the most investigated modality (31.7%). Anxiety disorders were the most commonly treated (68.3%). Multi-modal biofeedback appeared most effective in significantly ameliorating symptoms, suggesting that targeting more than one physiological modality for bio-regulation increases therapeutic efficacy. Overall, 80.9% of articles reported some level of clinical amelioration related to biofeedback exposure, 65.0% to a statistically significant (p < .05) level of symptom reduction based on reported standardized clinical parameters. Although the heterogeneity of the included studies warrants caution before explicit efficacy statements can be made. Further development of standardized controlled methodological protocols tailored for specific disorders and guidelines to generate comprehensive reports may contribute towards establishing the value of biofeedback interventions within mainstream psychiatry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EEG-neurofeedback has shown promising clinical effects in a wide variety of conditions including internalizing disorders.
“In any case, EEG-NFB has shown promising clinical effects in a wide various of conditions [130–135] including IDs [102, 136–155].”
The choice of sham-controls allows elucidation of potential specific (non-placebo) effects and addresses concerns about weak methodological designs in neurofeedback trials.
“Our choice of sham-controls allows us to elucidate any potential specific (e.g. non-placebo) effects and addresses widespread concerns of generally weak methodological designs in NFB trials [102, 172–174].”
Some research has shown that facilitating awareness of one's own physiology, such as brain activity or cardiac function, enhances the treatment effects of mental health disorders such as anxiety disorder, depression, OCD and schizophrenia via self-regulation.
“Some research has shown that facilitating awareness of one’s own physiology (such as brain activity or cardiac function) enhances the treatment effects of mental health disorders (such as anxiety disorder, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and schizophrenia) via self-regulation.17”
From A novel ACT-based video game to support mental health through embedded learning: A mixed-methods feasibility study protocol (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 248
- Authors
- Schoenberg, P. L. A., & David, A. S.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Schoenberg, Poppy L. A.
- Venue
- Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
- Published
- 2014-05-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-135
- ISSN
- 0363-3586 (ISSN-L)
- 1090-0586
- 1573-3270
- OpenAlex
- W2047050658
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (MR/J004162/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- biofeedback, mental illness, anxiety disorders, autism spectrum disorder, depression, dissociation, eating disorders, schizophrenia, psychosis, symptom relief, treatment efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Behavior Therapy, Mental Disorders, Biofeedback, Psychology, Humans, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review