Cited by 40Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Effects of Cognitive Appraisal and Mental Workload Factors on Performance in an Arithmetic Task

Galy, Edith, Mélan, Claudine·2015·Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

Abstract

We showed in a previous study an additive interaction between intrinsic and extraneous cognitive loads and of participants' alertness in an 1-back working memory task. The interaction between intrinsic and extraneous cognitive loads was only observed when participants' alertness was low (i.e. in the morning). As alertness is known to reflect an individual's general functional state, we suggested that the working memory capacity available for germane cognitive load depends on a participant's functional state, in addition to intrinsic and extraneous loads induced by the task and task conditions. The relationships between the different load types and their assessment by specific load measures gave rise to a modified cognitive load model. The aim of the present study was to complete the model by determining to what extent and at what processing level an individual's characteristics intervene in order to implement efficient strategies in a working memory task. Therefore, the study explored participants' cognitive appraisal of the situation in addition to the load factors considered previously-task difficulty, time pressure and alertness. Each participant performed a mental arithmetic task in four different cognitive load conditions (crossover of two task difficulty conditions and of two time pressure conditions), both while their alertness was low (9 a.m.) and high (4 p.m.). Results confirmed an additive effect of task difficulty and time pressure, previously reported in the 1-bac…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10484-015-9302-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 61 · Cited by 40

Authors
Galy, E., & Mélan, C.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
Published
2015-07-24
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
313-325
ISSN
  • 0363-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1090-0586
  • 1573-3270
OpenAlex
W2259579565
Cited by
40
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive load, mental workload, cognitive appraisal, threat appraisal, alertness, task difficulty, time pressure, mental arithmetic, working memory, cognitive overload, circadian variation, occupational safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Mathematical Concepts, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review