Challenges of Implementing Depression Care Management in the Primary Care Setting
Open accessAbstract
Empirical evidence shows that care management is an effective tool for improving depression treatment in primary care patients. However, several conceptual and practical issues have not been sufficiently addressed. This article explores questions concerning the scope of care management services within the chronic illness care model; optimal ways to identify depressed patients in the primary care setting; responsibilities and desirable qualifications of depression care managers; the location and manner in which care managers interact with patients; costs of services provided by care managers; and the level of supervision by mental health specialists that is necessary to ensure quality care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior research has highlighted the importance of clarifying the scope of CoCM services and the roles of care managers.
“Prior research has highlighted the importance of clarifying the scope of CoCM services and the roles of care managers (Belnap et al., 2006).”
From Barriers to and Facilitators of Using Evidence-Based, Cognitive–Behavioral Anxiety Interventions in Integrated Primary Care Practice (2023) · cites this paper as Belnap et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Badamgarav, E., Weingarten, S., Henning, J., Knight, K., Hasselblad, V., Gano, A., et al. (2003). Effectiveness of disease management programs in depression: a systematic review. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(12), 2080-2090.
- Gilbody, S., House, A., & Sheldon, T. (2001). Routinely admin- istered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 322, 406-409.
- Goldberg, H., Wagner, E., Fihn, S., Martin, D., Horowitz, C., Christensen, D., et al. (1998). A randomized controlled trial of CQI teams and academic detailing: can they alter com- pliance with guidelines? Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 24(3), 130-142.
- Institute of Medicine (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm. Wash- ington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
- Katon, W., VonKorff, M., Lin, E., Walker, E., Simon, G., Bush, T., et al. (1995). Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines. Impact on depression in primary care. JAMA, 273(13), 1026-1031.
- Kilbourne, A., Rollman, B., Schulberg, H., Herbeck Belnap, B., & Pincus, H. (2002). A clinical framework for depression treatment in primary care. Psychiatric Annals, 32, 545-535.
- Oxman, T., Dietrich, A., & Schulberg, H. (2003). The depression care manager and mental health specialist as collaborators within primary care. American Journal of Geriatric Psychia- try, 11(5), 507-516.
- Pincus, H., Pechura, C., Elinson, L., & Pettit, A. (2001). Depression in primary care: linking clinical and systems strategies. General Hospital Psychiatry, 23(6), 311-318.
- Rollman, B., Hanusa, B., Lowe, H., Gilbert, T., Kapoor, W., & Schulberg, H. (2002). A randomized trial using computerized decision support to improve the quality of treatment for major depression in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17, 493-503.
- Rollman, B., Herbeck Belnap, B., Reynolds, C., Schulberg, H., & Shear, K. (2003). A contemporary protocol to assist primary care physicians in the treatment of panic and generalized anxiety disorders. General Hospital Psychiatry, 25(2), 74-82.
- Rost, K., Nutting, P., Smith, J., & Werner, J. (2000). Designing and implementing a primary care intervention trial to im- prove the quality and outcome of care for major depression. General Hospital Psychiatry, 22(2), 66-77.
- Schulberg, H., Katon, W., Simon, G., & Rush, A. (1998). Treating major depression in primary care practice: An update of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Practice Guidelines. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(12), 1121- 1127.
- Simon, G., VonKorff, M., Rutter, C., & Wagner, E. (2000). Randomized trial of monitoring, feedback, and management of care by telephone to improve treatment of depression in primary care. British Medical Journal, 320(7234), 550-554.
- Wagner, E., Davis, C., Schaefer, J., Von Korff, M., & Austin, B. (1999). A survey of leading chronic disease management programs: Are they consistent with the literature? Managed Care Quarterly, 7(3), 56-66.
- Wells, K., Sherbourne, C., Schoenbaum, M., Duan, N., Meredith, L., Unu ¨tzer, J., et al. (2000). Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 283(2), 212- 220.
- Whooley, M., Stone, B., & Soghikian, K. (2000). Randomized trial of case-finding for depression in elderly primary care patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15(5), 293- 300.
- Authors
- Belnap, B. H., Kuebler, J., Upshur, C., Kerber, K., Mockrin, D. R., Kilbourne, A. M., & Rollman, B. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Belnap, Bea Herbeck
- Venue
- Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
- Published
- 2005-10-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-75
- ISSN
- 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3289
- OpenAlex
- W2014333441
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- depression care management, primary care, depression screening, quality of care
- MeSH terms
- Depression, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Primary Health Care, United States, Empirical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
