The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
Complex networks: structure and dynamics
BOCCALETTI, S., LATORA, V, MORENO, Y., CHAVEZ, M., & HWANG, D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · Cited by 11,010
Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345
Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21525 · Cited by 3,242
Self-citationBibliographic coupling between scientific papers
Kessler, M. M. (1963) · American Documentation · doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103 · Cited by 2,855
Garfield, E. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471 · Cited by 2,788 · cited 1×
“…per paper, self citations rate, number of highly cited papers, h-index [35], g-index [25], hg-index [3], q 2 -index [10], crown-index [46], etc. – Indicators based on the impact of the journal : Impact Factor [28][30], SJR [56], normalized impact factor, relative citations ratio [38], etc.”
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002 · Cited by 2,733
Self-citationTheory and practise of the g-index
Egghe, L. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7 · Cited by 2,354
From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis
Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901883022002003 · Cited by 1,951
Cited by
Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., Vazquez-Brust, D., & Yakovleva, N. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107050 · Cited by 359
The Gig Economy: Current Issues, the Debate, and the New Avenues of Research
Malik, R., Visvizi, A., & Skrzek-Lubasińska, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13095023 · Cited by 87
Virtual Reality in Health Care: Bibliometric Analysis
Pawassar, C. M., & Tiberius, V. (2021) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/32721 · Cited by 79
Armaou, M., Pears, M., Konstantinidis, S. T., & Blake, H. (2024) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph21030375 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M. Á., Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J.
- Venue
- Applied Intelligence
- Published
- 2017-12-13
- ISSN
- 0924-669X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7497
- OpenAlex
- W2772451958
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y
- The paper
- Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M. Á., Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2017). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
