The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal subgraph contrastive learning for anomaly detection on dynamic attributed graphs
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In dynamic graphs, subgraph anomalies can emerge through temporal densification or behavioral shifts. [36], [37]”
From A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
FRAUDAR: Bounding Graph Fraud in the Face of Camouflage
Hooi, B., Song, H. A., Beutel, A., Shah, N., Shin, K., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939747 · Cited by 305
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Ma X, Wu J, Xue S, Yang J, Zhou C, Sheng QZ, Xiong H, Akoglu L (2021) A comprehensive survey on graph anomaly detection with deep learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng
- Anand K, Kumar J, Anand K (2017) Anomaly detection in online social network: A survey. In: 2017 International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), pp 456–459. IEEE · DOI
- Zhang G, Li Z, Huang J, Wu J, Zhou C, Yang J (2018) efraudcom: An e-commerce fraud detection system via competitive graph neural networks. ACM Trans. Inf, Syst
- Akoglu L, Tong H, Koutra D (2015) Graph based anomaly detection and description: a survey. Data Mining Knowl Disc 29(3):626–688 · DOI · Paper page
- Cai L, Chen Z, Luo C, Gui J, Ni J, Li D, Chen H (2021) Structural temporal graph neural networks for anomaly detection in dynamic graphs. In: the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp 3747–3756 · DOI · Paper page
- Narayan A, Roe PH (2018) Learning graph dynamics using deep neural networks. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(2):433–438 · DOI
- Ji T, Yang D, Gao J (2013) Incremental local evolutionary outlier detection for dynamic social networks. In: the Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp 1–15. Springer · DOI
- Yu Y, Wang W, Wu N, Liu H, Shao M (2022) Iisd: Integrated interaction subgraph detection for event mining. Knowl-Based Syst (Mar.15), 240 · DOI
- Tang C, Xu L, Yang B, Tang Y, Zhao D (2023) Gru-based interpretable multivariate time series anomaly detection in industrial control system. Comput Secur 127:103094 · DOI
- Li G, Jung JJ (2023) Deep learning for anomaly detection in multivariate time series: Approaches, applications, and challenges. Inf Fusion 91:93–102 · DOI
- Yu Y, Wang W, Wu N, Liu H, Shao M (2022) Iisd: Integrated interaction subgraph detection for event mining. Knowl-Based Syst 240:108080 · DOI
- Ding K, Li J, Bhanushali R, Liu H (2019) Deep anomaly detection on attributed networks. In: Proceedings of the 2019 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp 594–602. SIAM · DOI
- Liu Y, Pan S, Wang YG, Xiong F, Wang L, Chen Q, Lee VC (2021) Anomaly detection in dynamic graphs via transformer. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng
- Jin M, Liu Y, Zheng Y, Chi L, Li Y-F, Pan S (2021) Anemone: Graph anomaly detection with multi-scale contrastive learning. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp 3122–3126 · DOI
- Pareja A, Domeniconi G, Chen J, Ma T, Suzumura T, Kanezashi H, Kaler T, Schardl T, Leiserson C (2020) Evolvegcn: Evolving graph convolutional networks for dynamic graphs. In: the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol 34, pp 5363–5370 · DOI
- Yoon M, Hooi B, Shin K, Faloutsos C (2019) Fast and accurate anomaly detection in dynamic graphs with a two-pronged approach. In: the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp 647–657 · DOI
- Xue B, Gao X, Zhai F, Li B, Yu J, Fu S, Chen L, Meng Z (2023) A contrastive autoencoder with multi-resolution segment-consistency discrimination for multivariate time series anomaly detection. Appl Intell 53(23):28655–28674 · DOI
- Teng X, Lin Y-R, Wen X (2017) Anomaly detection in dynamic networks using multi-view time-series hypersphere learning. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp 827–836 · DOI
- Cho K, Van Merriënboer B, Gulcehre C, Bahdanau D, Bougares F, Schwenk H, Bengio Y (2014) Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv:1406.1078 · DOI · Paper page
- Kipf TN, Welling M (2016) Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv:1609.02907 · arXiv
- Veličković P, Cucurull G, Casanova A, Romero A, Lio P, Bengio Y (2017) Graph attention networks. arXiv:1710.10903 · arXiv
- Xu K, Hu W, Leskovec J, Jegelka S (2018) How powerful are graph neural networks? arXiv:1810.00826 · arXiv
- Geisler S, Zügner D, Günnemann S (2020) Reliable graph neural networks via robust aggregation. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 33:13272–13284
- Zhu S, Pan S, Zhou C, Wu J, Cao Y, Wang B (2020) Graph geometry interaction learning. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 33:7548–7558
- Wu M, Pan S, Du L, Zhu X (2021) Learning graph neural networks with positive and unlabeled nodes. ACM Trans Knowl Disc Data (TKDD) 15(6):1–25 · DOI
- Kale R, Thing VLL (2023) Few-shot weakly-supervised cybersecurity anomaly detection. Comput Secur 130:103194 · DOI
- Gao Y, Yu X, Zhang H (2022) Graph clustering using triangle-aware measures in large networks. Inf Sci 584:618–632 · DOI
- Gao Y, Yu X, Zhang H (2021) Overlapping community detection by constrained personalized pagerank. Exp Syst Appl 173:114682 · DOI
- Chen J, Pi D, Wang X (2024) A two-stage adversarial transformer based approach for multivariate industrial time series anomaly detection. Appl Intell, 1–20 · DOI
- Xue L, Chen Y, Luo M, Peng Z, Liu J (2020) An anomaly detection framework for time-evolving attributed networks. Neurocomput 407:39–49 · DOI
- Goel R, Kazemi SM, Brubaker M, Poupart P (2020) Diachronic embedding for temporal knowledge graph completion. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol 34, pp 3988–3995 · DOI · Paper page
- Sharma K, Trivedi R, Sridhar R, Kumar S (2023) Temporal dynamics-aware adversarial attacks on discrete-time dynamic graph models. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp 2023–2035 · DOI
- Yu Y, Wang W, Shao M, Wu N, Sun Y, Sun Y, Tian Q (2022) Multi-users interaction anomalous subgraph detection for event mining. Neurocomput 509:34–45 · DOI
- Guo D, Liu Z, Li R (2023) Regraphgan: A graph generative adversarial network model for dynamic network anomaly detection. Neural Netw 166:273–285 · DOI
- Diro A, Kaisar S, Vasilakos AV, Anwar A, Nasirian A, Olani G (2024) Anomaly detection for space information networks: A survey of challenges, techniques, and future directions. Comput Secur 139:103705 · DOI
- Sricharan K, Das K (2014) Localizing anomalous changes in time-evolving graphs. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp 1347–1358 · DOI
- Zheng L, Li Z, Li J, Li Z, Gao J (2019) Addgraph: Anomaly detection in dynamic graph using attention-based temporal gcn. In: IJCAI, pp 4419–4425 · DOI · Paper page
- Yu W, Cheng W, Aggarwal CC, Zhang K, Wang W (2018) Netwalk: A flexible deep embedding approach for anomaly detection in dynamic networks. In: the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference · DOI
- Yang C, Zhou L, Wen H, Zhou Z, Wu Y (2020) H-vgrae: A hierarchical stochastic spatial-temporal embedding method for robust anomaly detection in dynamic networks. arXiv:2007.06903 · arXiv
- Chen A, Fu Y, Zheng X, lu G (2022) An efficient network behavior anomaly detection using a hybrid dbn-lstm network. Comput Secur 114:102600 · DOI
- Zuo Y, Liu G, Lin H, Guo J, Hu X, Wu J (2018) Embedding temporal network via neighborhood formation. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp 2857–2866 · DOI
- Gao Y, Zhang H, Yu X (2023) Higher-order community detection: On information degeneration and its elimination. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 31(2):891–903 · DOI
- Kong X, Zhang W, Wang H, Hou M, Chen X, Yan X, Das SK (2024) Federated graph anomaly detection via contrastive self-supervised learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 1–14
- Tong, H., Faloutsos, C., Pan, J.-Y.: Fast random walk with restart and its applications. In: Sixth International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’06), pp. 613–622 (2006). IEEE · DOI
- Desmier E, Plantevit M, Robardet C, Boulicaut J-F (2012) Cohesive co-evolution patterns in dynamic attributed graphs. In: International Conference on Discovery Science, pp 110–124. Springer · DOI
- Zheng Y, Jin M, Liu Y, Chi L, Phan KT, Chen Y-PP (2021) Generative and contrastive self-supervised learning for graph anomaly detection. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Cybersecurity Anomaly Detection
Jiang, L., Ryan, R., Li, Q., & Ferdosian, N. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.26307 · Cited by 13
“[ 37], [38], [39] Node, edge, and subgraph anomalies represent conceptually distinct categories, yet they frequently co-occur in real-world graphs.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, Y., Li, X., Shao, M., Sun, Y., & Wang, W.
- Affiliations
- China People's Public Security University (CN)
- Tianjin University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Xin
- Venue
- Applied Intelligence
- Published
- 2025-04-17
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0924-669X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7497
- OpenAlex
- W4409489554
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2024JKF02ZK10)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Graph Theory and Algorithms
- Keywords
- anomaly detection, node representation learning, temporal contrastive learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal subgraph contrastive learning for anomaly detection on dynamic attributed graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10489-025-06402-8
- The paper
- Yu, Y., Li, X., Shao, M., Sun, Y., & Wang, W. (2025). Temporal subgraph contrastive learning for anomaly detection on dynamic attributed graphs. Applied Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-025-06402-8