Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ticks (Ixodidae) on humans in South America

Open access
Guglielmone, A. A., Beati, L., Barros-Battesti, D. M., Labruna, M. B., Nava, S., Venzal, J. M., Mangold, A. J., Szabó, M. P. J., Martins, J. R., González-Acuña, D., Estrada-Peña, A.·2006·Experimental and Applied Acarology

Abstract

Twenty eight species of Ixodidae have been found on man in South America (21 Amblyomma, 1 Boophilus, 2 Dermacentor, 2 Haemaphysalis, 1 Ixodes and 1 Rhipicephalus species). Most of them are rarely found on man. However, three species frequently parasitize humans in restricted areas of Argentina (A. neumanni reported from 46 localities), Uruguay (A. triste from 21 sites) and Argentina–Brazil (A. parvum from 27 localities). The most widespread ticks are A. cajennense (134 localities in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Paraguay, Suriname and Venezuela), A. ovale (37 localities in Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Paraguay, Suriname and Venezuela) and A. oblongoguttatum (28 sites in Brazil, Colombia, French Guiana, Guyana, Suriname and Venezuela). Amblyomma aureolatum (18 localities in Argentina, Brazil, French Guiana and Paraguay), A. cajennense, and A. triste are vectors of rickettsioses to man in South America. A better understanding of the respective roles of these and other tick species in transmitting pathogens to humans will require further local investigations. Amblyomma ticks should be the main subjects of these studies followed by species of Boophilus, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis and Rhipicephalus species. In contrast with North America, Europe and Asia, ticks of the genus Ixodes do not appear to be major players in transmitting diseases to human. Indeed, there is only one record of an Ixodes collected while feeding on man for all South America.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10493-006-9027-0

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Guglielmone, A. A., Beati, L., Barros-Battesti, D. M., Labruna, M. B., Nava, S., Venzal, J. M., Mangold, A. J., Szabó, M. P. J., Martins, J. R., González-Acuña, D., & Estrada-Peña, A.
Venue
Experimental and Applied Acarology
Published
2006-11-14
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
83-100
ISSN
  • 0168-8162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9702
OpenAlex
W2076307831
Cited by
388
References
7
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ticks (Ixodidae) on humans in South America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10493-006-9027-0
The paper
Guglielmone, A. A., Beati, L., Barros-Battesti, D. M., Labruna, M. B., Nava, S., Venzal, J. M., Mangold, A. J., Szabó, M. P. J., Martins, J. R., González-Acuña, D., & Estrada-Peña, A. (2006). Ticks (Ixodidae) on humans in South America. Experimental and Applied Acarology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-006-9027-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.