CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 240Marriage and Sexual RelationshipsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologySexual function and dysfunction studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infidelity in Heterosexual Couples: Demographic, Interpersonal, and Personality-Related Predictors of Extradyadic Sex

Mark, Kristen P., Janssen, Erick, Milhausen, Robin R.·2011·Archives of Sexual Behavior
DOI 10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the relative importance of demographic, interpersonal, and personality factors in predicting sexual infidelity in heterosexual couples. A total of 506 men (M age = 32.86 years, SD = 10.60) and 412 women (M age = 27.66 years, SD = 8.93), who indicated they were in a monogamous sexual relationship, completed a series of questionnaires, including the Sexual Excitation/Inhibition (SES/SIS) scales and the Mood and Sexuality Questionnaire, and answered questions about, among others, religiosity, education, income, relationship and sexual satisfaction, and sexual compatibility. Almost one-quarter of men (23.2%) and 19.2% of women indicated that they had "cheated" during their current relationship (i.e., engaged in sexual interactions with someone other than their partner that could jeopardize, or hurt, their relationship). Among men, a logistic regression analysis, explaining 17% of the variance, revealed that a higher propensity of sexual excitation (SES) and sexual inhibition due to "the threat of performance concerns" (SIS1), a lower propensity for sexual inhibition due to "the threat of performance consequences" (SIS2), and an increased tendency to engage in regretful sexual behavior during negative affective states were all significant predictors of infidelity. In women, a similar regression analysis explained 21% of the variance in engaging in infidelity. In addition to SIS1 and SIS2, for which the same patterns were found as for men, low relationship happiness and low compatibility in terms of sexual attitudes and values were predictive of infidelity. The findings of this study suggest that, for both men and women, sexual personality characteristics and, for women, relationship factors are more relevant to the prediction of sexual infidelity than demographic variables such as marital status and religiosity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McCabe, M. P. (1999). The interrelationship between intimacy, relational functioning, and sexuality among men and women in committed relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 8, 31–38.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–239 of 239

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mark, K. P., Janssen, E., & Milhausen, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Mark, Kristen P.
ORCID
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-06-11
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
971-982
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
DOI
10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z
OpenAlex
W2131215014
Cited by
240
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
33.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD043689)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
sexual infidelity, heterosexual couples, sexual excitation, sexual inhibition, negative emotions, sexual compatibility, relationship satisfaction, relationship happiness, religiosity, demographic predictors, personality predictors
MeSH terms
Adult, Courtship, Extramarital Relations, Female, Humans, Deception, Male, Marriage, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Social Values, Sex Distribution, Spouses, Heterosexuality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review