Cited by 141Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologySex work and related issuesAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Online Sexual Activity Experiences Among College Students: A Four-Country Comparison

Döring, Nicola, Daneback, Kristian, Shaughnessy, Krystelle, Grov, Christian, Byers, E. Sandra·2017·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare male and female college students in four countries (Canada, Germany, Sweden, and the U.S.) on their lifetime experiences (prevalence) and frequency of recent experiences with six types of online sexual activities (OSA): sexual information, sexual entertainment, sexual contacts, sexual minority communities, sexual products, and sex work. Participants (N = 2690; M age, 24.65 years; 53.4 % women, 46.6 % men) were recruited from a university in each of the countries to complete an online survey that included background and demographic questions, and questions about OSA. Most participants reported experience with accessing sexual information (89.8 %) and sexual entertainment (76.5 %) online. Almost half (48.5 %) reported browsing for sexual products, and a substantial minority reported having engaged in cybersex (30.8 %). Very few participants (1.1 %) paid for online sexual services or received payment (0.5 %). In general, participants showed relatively infrequent experience with all types of OSA within the last 3 months. Men showed both higher prevalence and frequency of use of sexually stimulating material online than did women. However, this gender gap was smaller than in previous studies. Country and gender by country effects were (with one exception) either very small or non-existent, suggesting that, overall, students in the four countries were similar in their OSA experiences. Results are discussed in light of an emerging global net generation and globalized sexual culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-015-0656-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 141

Authors
Döring, N., Daneback, K., Shaughnessy, K., Grov, C., & Byers, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
Corresponding author
Döring, Nicola
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2015-12-10
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
1641-1652
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2190246630
Cited by
141
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
online sexual behavior, university students, cybersex, sexual information, sex work, gender differences, cross-national comparison, sexual culture, digital natives
MeSH terms
Adult, Canada, Erotica, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Sex Work, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Students, Sweden, United States, Universities, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review