Cited by 129Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyMental Health and Psychiatry

Proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Eleventh Revision (ICD-11)

Open access
Krueger, Richard B., Reed, Geoffrey M., First, Michael B., Marais, Adele, Kismodi, Eszter, Briken, Peer·2017·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

The World Health Organization is currently developing the 11th revision of the International Classifications of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), with approval of the ICD-11 by the World Health Assembly anticipated in 2018. The Working Group on the Classification of Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health (WGSDSH) was created and charged with reviewing and making recommendations for categories related to sexuality that are contained in the chapter of Mental and Behavioural Disorders in ICD-10 (World Health Organization 1992a). Among these categories was the ICD-10 grouping F65, Disorders of sexual preference, which describes conditions now widely referred to as Paraphilic Disorders. This article reviews the evidence base, rationale, and recommendations for the proposed revisions in this area for ICD-11 and compares them with DSM-5. The WGSDSH recommended that the grouping, Disorders of sexual preference, be renamed to Paraphilic Disorders and be limited to disorders that involve sexual arousal patterns that focus on non-consenting others or are associated with substantial distress or direct risk of injury or death. Consistent with this framework, the WGSDSH also recommended that the ICD-10 categories of Fetishism, Fetishistic Transvestism, and Sadomasochism be removed from the classification and new categories of Coercive Sexual Sadism Disorder, Frotteuristic Disorder, Other Paraphilic Disorder Involving Non-Consenting Individuals, and Other Paraphilic Disorder Involving Solitary Behaviour or Consenting Individuals be added. The WGSDSH's proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in ICD-11 are based on the WHO's role as a global public health agency and the ICD's function as a public health reporting tool.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-017-0944-2

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These ICD-10 categories were not carried over to the ICD-11 as named diagnostic entities because they were seen as contributing unnecessarily to stigmatization of variations in sexual arousal that are not in themselves associated with distress, functional impairment, harm, or violation of the rights of others.

    “These ICD-10 categories were not carried over to the ICD-11 as named diagnostic entities, because they were seen as contributing unnecessarily to stigmatization of variations in sexual arousal that are not in themselves associated with distress, functional impairment, harm, or violation of the rights of others 87 .”

    From An organization‐ and category‐level comparison of diagnostic requirements for mental disorders in <scp>ICD</scp> ‐11 and <scp>DSM</scp> ‐5 (2021) · cites this paper as [87]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable, 1 not checked. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ICD-11 does not include functional impairment in Paraphilic Disorders because of concerns about the subjectivity and potential misuse of this element to stigmatize and even criminalize atypical sexual behaviours.

    “The ICD-11 makes the same allowance for distress, but does not include functional impairment in the diagnostic requirements for any of the Paraphilic Disorders, because of concerns about the subjectivity and potential misuse of this element to stigmatize and even criminalize atypical sexual behaviours 87 .”

    From An organization‐ and category‐level comparison of diagnostic requirements for mental disorders in <scp>ICD</scp> ‐11 and <scp>DSM</scp> ‐5 (2021) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Comparison of ICD-11 Recommendations with DSM-5 section says interference with social roles was not included as a diagnostic requirement in the proposed ICD-11 guidelines. The Considerations section discusses stigma, criminalization, and misuse of diagnoses, but does not identify the subjectivity or potential misuse of functional impairment as the reason for omitting that requirement. The paper describes proposals, rather than the finalized ICD-11. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bennett T Sadomasochism and human rights (sexual conduct) act 1994 Sydney Law Review 2013 35 541 564
  2. World Health Organization. (1992b). ICD-10 international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10 revision ed., Vol. 1). Geneva: World Health Organization.
  3. World Health Organization. (1993). ICD-10 international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision (Vol. 2). Geneva: World Health Organization.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krueger, R. B., Reed, G. M., First, M. B., Marais, A., Kismodi, E., & Briken, P.
Affiliations
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Krueger, Richard B.
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2017-02-16
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1529-1545
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2588281431
Cited by
129
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
15.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • The International Union of Psychological Science
  • The National Institute of Mental Health (USA)
  • The World Psychiatric Association
  • The Royal College of Psychiatry (UK)
  • The Spanish Foundation of Psychiatry and Mental Health (Spain)
  • The Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
  • The Department of Psychiatry Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
paraphilic disorders, ICD-11, ICD-10, DSM-5, sexual sadism, fetishism, sadomasochism, sexual health, diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Fetishism, Psychiatric, Humans, Masochism, Paraphilic Disorders, Sexual Behavior, Transvestism, Sexuality, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review