Cited by 49Animal Behavior and ReproductionHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Effect of Domestication on Aggression in Gray Norway Rats

Plyusnina, Irina Z., Solov’eva, Maria Yu., Oskina, Irina N.·2011·Behavior Genetics

Abstract

A comparative analysis of intermale aggression in the resident-intruder test was conducted with gray rats from a wild unselected population bred at the laboratory for three generations and gray rats selected for elimination (tame) and enhancement (aggressive) of aggressiveness towards human for 71-72 generations. Males from the laboratory line Wistar were used as neutral opponents. Rats from the tame line were characterized by reduced aggression manifest as longer attack latency, decreased number of attacks, upright postures, chases, kicks, and shorter total time of aggressive behavior compared to unselected males. There was no significant difference in the attack latency and the total time of aggression between rats of the aggressive line and unselected rats. A trend to decrease in the number of attacks, chases and upright postures and to increase in contribution of lateral threat postures to the total time of aggression was observed for males of the aggressive line. Plasma corticosterone in unselected males not presented with intruders and after their presentation was higher than in males of both selected lines. Comparative behavioral analysis of agonistic behaviors in rats from the aggressive and tame lines to opponents of different lines (Wistar, tame, aggressive) showed that the presence of an intruder from the aggressive line can enhance aggressive responses in residents from the tame line. Thus, selection for domestication of gray rats caused a significant attenuation of aggressive behavior without affecting the basic agonistic repertoire.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10519-010-9429-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laboratory animals are less aggressive and more tolerant to experimenters and cagemates than their wild counterparts.

    “The former are less aggressive and more tolerant not only to the experimenters, but also to their cagemates 26 (see also Section 3).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 49

Authors
Plyusnina, I. Z., Solov’eva, M. Y., & Oskina, I. N.
Affiliations
Institute of Cytology and Genetics (RU)
Corresponding author
Plyusnina, Irina Z.
Venue
Behavior Genetics
Published
2010-12-24
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
583-592
ISSN
  • 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3297
OpenAlex
W2056816537
Cited by
49
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
domestication, aggression, resident-intruder test, agonistic behavior, corticosterone, attack latency, male-male aggression, Wistar rats
MeSH terms
Aggression, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Behavior, Animal, Corticosterone, Genetics, Behavioral, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Species Specificity, Models, Statistical, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review