The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities
Open accessAbstract
In augmentative biological control (ABC), invertebrate and microbial organisms are seasonally released in large numbers to reduce pests. Today it is applied on more than 30 million ha worldwide. Europe is the largest commercial market for invertebrate biological control agents, while North America has the largest sales of microbials. A strong growth in use of ABC, particularly of microbial agents, is taking place in Latin America, followed by Asia. The current popularity of ABC is due to (1) its inherent positive characteristics (healthier for farm workers and persons living in farming communities, no harvesting interval or waiting period after release of agents, sustainable as there is no development of resistance against arthropod natural enemies, no phytotoxic damage to plants, better yields and a healthier product, reduced pesticide residues [well below the legal Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs)], (2) professionalism of the biological control industry (inexpensive large scale mass production, proper quality control, efficient packaging, distribution and release methods, and availability of many (>440 species) control agents for numerous pests), (3) a number of recent successes showing how biological control can save agricultural production when pesticides fail or are not available, (4) several non-governmental organizations (NGOs), consumers, and retailers demanding pesticide residues far below the legal MRLs, and (5) policy developments in several regions of the world aimed at reduction and replacement of synthetic pesticides by more sustainable methods of pest management. We are convinced, however, that ABC can be applied on a much larger area than it is today. We plead in the short term for a pragmatic form of agriculture that is adaptable, non-dogmatic and combines the sustainability gain from all types of agriculture and pest management methods. We then propose to move to “conscious agriculture”, which involves participation of all stakeholders in the production and consumer chain, and respects the environment and resource availability for future generations. Were “conscious agriculture” to be considered a serious alternative to conventional farming, ABC would face an even brighter future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347
Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap
Ponisio, L. C., M'Gonigle, L. K., Mace, K. C., Palomino, J., de Valpine, P., & Kremen, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1396 · Cited by 871
Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance, or herbivory
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., & Isbell, F. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1208240109 · Cited by 566
Cited by
Köhl, J., Kolnaar, R., & Ravensberg, W. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00845 · Cited by 1,382
Self-citationThirteen decades of antimicrobial copper compounds applied in agriculture. A review
Lamichhane, J. R., Osdaghi, E., Behlau, F., Köhl, J., Jones, J. B., & Aubertot, J.-N. (2018) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-018-0503-9 · Cited by 601
Self-citationda Silva, G. D. P., & Hesselberg, T. (2020) · Neotropical Entomology · doi:10.1007/s13744-019-00719-z · Cited by 128
Major Soilborne Pathogens of Field Processing Tomatoes and Management Strategies
Ma, M., Taylor, P. W. J., Chen, D., Vaghefi, N., & He, J.-Z. (2023) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11020263 · Cited by 108
An Assessment of the Multifunctionality of Integrated Buffer Zones in Northwestern Europe
Zak, D., Stutter, M., Jensen, H. S., Egemose, S., Carstensen, M. V., Audet, J., Strand, J. A., Feuerbach, P., Hoffmann, C. C., Christen, B., et al. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2018.05.0216 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., & Urbaneja, A.
- Venue
- BioControl
- Published
- 2017-03-18
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-59
- ISSN
- 1386-6141 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-8248
- OpenAlex
- W2597376791
- Cited by
- 1,034
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 67.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4
- The paper
- van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., & Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities. BioControl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.