Cited by 66Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Is there an urban effect in alien plant invasions?

Open access
Kühn, Ingolf, Wolf, Janis, Schneider, Aline·2017·Biological Invasions

Abstract

Cities are known to be extraordinarily rich in alien plant species compared to rural environments. This is related to specific attributes of urban areas including the availability of natural resources and habitats (namely geological substrates and land cover), the dispersal pathways and associated propagule pressure due to trade and traffic, and the proximity many urban hubs have to rivers. Here we explored how richness and proportions of alien species introduced after the discovery of the Americas (so-called neophytes), can be explained by environmental covariates along the urbanization gradient from very rural to very urbanized grid cells. We tested whether there is a specific urban effect, either as an interaction effect of urbanized areas that changes these general relationships, or if there is an effect due to specific urban conditions. We found that the environmental covariates explaining richness as well as proportions of neophytes remain largely the same across the rural–urban gradient. There is, however, an effect of urbanized area on neophyte species richness and proportions, which also incorporates strictly urban conditions. Rivers, roads and railroads contribute disproportionately less to the increase of neophyte species diversity in more urbanized areas, which might be due to the already higher number of neophytes in cities. We argue that the conditions determining neophyte richness in cities are not fundamentally different from those in rural environments, but extend on the same environmental axis, i.e. having different positions along the gradient towards the upper end.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10530-017-1591-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Urban habitats are well documented as hotspots of alien plant species establishment and spread because of high colonization and propagule pressures resulting from trade, traffic, horticulture, and frequent and intense disturbances.

    “Urban habitats are well documented as hotspots of alien plant species establishment and spread because of high colonization and propagule pressures resulting from trade, traffic, horticulture, and frequent and intense disturbances (Hulme, 2009; Kühn, Wolf, & Schneider, 2017).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Kühn, Wolf, & Schneider, 2017

    The Introduction describes urban areas as hotspots of alien plant richness and links trade, traffic, and gardens and parks to propagule pressure and alien plant spread. The supplied passages do not establish high colonization pressure or frequent, intense disturbance as causes of that pattern. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL (1995) Analysis of longitudinal data. Clarendon, Oxford
  2. Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araujo MB et al (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609-628
  3. Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S et al (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27-46
  4. Kowarik I (2005) Urban ornamentals escaped from cultivation. In: Gressel J (ed) Crop ferality and volunteerism. CRC Press, pp 97-121
  5. McLean P, Gallien L, Wilson JRU, Gaertner M, Richardson DM (2017) Small urban centres as launching sites for plant invasions in natural areas: insights from South Africa. Biol Invasions. doi:10.1007/s10530-017-1600-4 · DOI
  6. Padayachee AL, Irlich UM, Faulkner KT, Gaertner M, Proches ¸ S, Wilson JRU, Rouget M (2017) How do invasive species travel to and through urban environments? Biol Invasions. doi:10.1007/s10530-017-1596-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kühn, I., Wolf, J., & Schneider, A.
Affiliations
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Kühn, Ingolf
Venue
Biological Invasions
Published
2017-10-17
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
3505-3513
ISSN
  • 1387-3547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1464
OpenAlex
W2765111327
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Invasions (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesamt für Naturschutz
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
non-native plants, urban-rural gradient, neophytes, species richness, urban influence, propagule pressure, dispersal routes, rivers, roads and railroads, urban-rural differences, plant invasion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review