Monitoring tropical forest fragmentation in the Zagné-Taï area (west of Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire)
Abstract
Deforestation west of the Tai National Park over the last 3 decades has been dramatic, with forest cover of rural areas decreasing from 89.6% in 1974 to 6.7% in 2003. The process comprised 3 major steps. During the 10 first years, deforestation was limited to a ca. 5 km band each side of the main north-south track. From 1984 to 1990 there was a massive increase in deforestation whose front met the limits of the protected areas, leaving many forest fragments of various sizes forming a mosaic in the landscape. From 1990 to 2003 these fragments were further deforested by being either totally destroyed or reduced in size, or further split into smaller units. During these latter 13 years their number was halved, their average area was reduced by an 8th, and their total area reduced by an 11th. In addition, a moving cost analysis has indicated that most of the area could now be out of reach for forest species dispersion. This critical situation may be explained by the increase of population pressure (due to internal increment as well as massive immigration) causing increased land cultivation and a growing trend to permanent cash crop cultivation, which removed important surfaces from the traditional shifting cultivation cycle. Without the implementation of a forest fragment protection policy local population demands for wood and non-timber forest products would likely be entirely dependant on protected areas in the future. Furthermore, deforestation pressure is likely to reach the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is large-scale fragmentation alongside the western border of Taï National Park related to timber extraction and the establishment of new crops.
“There is, however, large-scale fragmentation alongside the western border of Taï National Park related to timber extraction and the establishment of new crops (Chatelain et al. 2010).”
From Forest loss during 2000–2019 in pygmy hippopotamus (<i>Choeropsis liberiensis</i>) habitats was driven by shifting agriculture (2024) · cites this paper as Chatelain et al. 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 32 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Chatelain, C., Bakayoko, A., Martin, P., & Gautier, L.
- Affiliations
- Jardin Botanique de Genève (CH)
- Université Nangui Abrogoua (CI)
- Corresponding author
- Chatelain, C.
- Venue
- Biodiversity and Conservation
- Published
- 2010-04-18
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2405-2420
- ISSN
- 0960-3115 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9710
- OpenAlex
- W2036856998
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Biodiversity and Conservation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- tropical forest fragmentation, deforestation, Taï National Park, forest cover loss, protected areas, population pressure, cash crop cultivation, shifting cultivation, non-timber forest products, timber demand
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review