Soil minerals and humic acids alter enzyme stability: implications for ecosystem processes
Abstract
In most ecosystems, the degradation of complex organic material depends on extracellular enzymes produced by microbes. These enzymes can exist in bound or free form within the soil, but the dynamics of these different enzyme pools remain uncertain. To address this uncertainty, I determined rates of enzyme turnover in a volcanic soil with and without added enzymes. I also tested whether or not soil minerals and humic acids would alter enzyme activity. In soils that were gamma-irradiated to stop enzyme production, 35-70% of the enzyme activity was stable throughout the 21-day incubation. The remaining enzyme fraction decayed at rates ranging from - 0.032 to - 0.628 day-¹. In both the irradiated soils and in soils with added enzymes, addition of the mineral allophane had a strong positive effect on most enzyme activities. Another added mineral, ferrihydrite, had a weak positive effect on some enzymes. Added humic acids strongly inhibited enzyme activity. These findings suggest that minerals, especially allophane, enhance potential enzyme activities in young volcanic soils. However, the actual activity and function of these enzymes may be low under field conditions if stabilization results in less efficient enzyme-substrate interactions. If this is the case, then much of the measured enzyme activity in bulk soil may be stabilized but unlikely to contribute greatly to ecosystem processes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K., & Paul, E. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12113 · Cited by 3,552 · see citing works
Boltz, J. P., & Rittmann, B. E. (2024) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiae125 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Allison, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Allison, Steven D.
- ORCID
- Allison, Steven D.
- Venue
- Biogeochemistry
- Published
- 2006-10-03
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361-373
- ISSN
- 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-515X
- OpenAlex
- W2142888772
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Biogeochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
- Keywords
- soil enzymes, enzyme stability, enzyme turnover, allophane, ferrihydrite, humic acid, soil minerals, enzyme stabilization, organic matter decomposition, volcanic soils, gamma irradiation, substrate binding, extracellular enzymes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review