Cited by 305Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

Soil minerals and humic acids alter enzyme stability: implications for ecosystem processes

Allison, Steven D.·2006·Biogeochemistry

Abstract

In most ecosystems, the degradation of complex organic material depends on extracellular enzymes produced by microbes. These enzymes can exist in bound or free form within the soil, but the dynamics of these different enzyme pools remain uncertain. To address this uncertainty, I determined rates of enzyme turnover in a volcanic soil with and without added enzymes. I also tested whether or not soil minerals and humic acids would alter enzyme activity. In soils that were gamma-irradiated to stop enzyme production, 35-70% of the enzyme activity was stable throughout the 21-day incubation. The remaining enzyme fraction decayed at rates ranging from - 0.032 to - 0.628 day-¹. In both the irradiated soils and in soils with added enzymes, addition of the mineral allophane had a strong positive effect on most enzyme activities. Another added mineral, ferrihydrite, had a weak positive effect on some enzymes. Added humic acids strongly inhibited enzyme activity. These findings suggest that minerals, especially allophane, enhance potential enzyme activities in young volcanic soils. However, the actual activity and function of these enzymes may be low under field conditions if stabilization results in less efficient enzyme-substrate interactions. If this is the case, then much of the measured enzyme activity in bulk soil may be stabilized but unlikely to contribute greatly to ecosystem processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10533-006-9046-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Allison, S. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Allison, Steven D.
Venue
Biogeochemistry
Published
2006-10-03
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
361-373
ISSN
  • 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-515X
OpenAlex
W2142888772
Cited by
305
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biogeochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Keywords
soil enzymes, enzyme stability, enzyme turnover, allophane, ferrihydrite, humic acid, soil minerals, enzyme stabilization, organic matter decomposition, volcanic soils, gamma irradiation, substrate binding, extracellular enzymes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review