The effect of fire on microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of field studies
Open accessAbstract
Soil microbes regulate the transfer of carbon (C) from ecosystems to the atmosphere and in doing so influence feedbacks between terrestrial ecosystems and global climate change. Fire is one element of global change that may influence soil microbial communities and, in turn, their contribution to the C dynamics of ecosystems. In order to improve our understanding of how fire influences belowground communities, we conducted a meta-analysis of 42 published microbial responses to fire. We hypothesized that microbial biomass as a whole, and fungal biomass specifically, would be altered following fires. Across all studies, fire reduced microbial abundance by an average of 33.2% and fungal abundance by an average of 47.6%. However, microbial responses to fire differed significantly among biomes and fire types. For example, microbial biomass declined following fires in boreal and temperate forests but not following grasslands fires. In addition, wildfires lead to a greater reduction in microbial biomass than prescribed burns. These differences are likely attributable to differences in fire severity among biomes and fire types. Changes in microbial abundance were significantly correlated with changes in soil CO2 emissions. Altogether, these results suggest that fires may significantly decrease microbial abundance, with corresponding consequences for soil CO2 emissions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Responses of microbial biomass and diversity to fire can persist for a decade or more, depending on the ecosystem, fire severity and organic horizon loss.
“Responses of microbial biomass and diversity can persist for a decade or more, depending on the ecosystem, fire severity and organic horizon loss (Dooley & Treseder, 2012;Pressler, Moore, & Cotrufo, 2018).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Dooley & Treseder, 2012
Shifts in microbial biomass and composition occur on sub-annual to decadal time-scales.
“For example, shifts in microbial biomass and composition occur on sub-annual to decadal time-scales (Dooley & Treseder, 2012) whereas the effect of charcoal formation on soil carbon storage occurs over centennial to millennial time-scales (He et al., 2016).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Dooley & Treseder, 2012
Cites
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., & Swetnam, T. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128834 · Cited by 5,176 · see citing works
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · see citing works
Ergosterol and microbial biomass relationship in soil
Djajakirana, G., Joergensen, R. G., & Meyer, B. (1996) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/bf00334573 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
“For example, shifts in microbial biomass and composition occur on sub-annual to decadal time-scales (Dooley & Treseder, 2012) whereas the effect of charcoal formation on soil carbon storage occurs over cen-tennial to millennial time-scales (He et al., 2016).”
Mäkipää, R., Abramoff, R., Adamczyk, B., Baldy, V., Biryol, C., Bosela, M., Casals, P., Curiel Yuste, J., Dondini, M., Filipek, S., et al. (2023) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120637 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Ludwig, S. M., Alexander, H. D., Kielland, K., Mann, P. J., Natali, S. M., & Ruess, R. W. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14455 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dooley, S. R., & Treseder, K. K.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dooley, Sandra R.
- Venue
- Biogeochemistry
- Published
- 2011-08-20
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 49-61
- ISSN
- 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-515X
- OpenAlex
- W2062092881
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biogeochemistry (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Office of Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Keywords
- soil microbial biomass, fungal biomass, soil carbon cycling, soil CO2 efflux, forest fires, prescribed burning, fire severity, biomes, boreal forest, temperate forests, grassland fires, climate feedbacks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review