Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plant water status, H2O2 scavenging enzymes, ethylene evolution and membrane integrity of Cicer arietinum roots as affected by salinity

Open access
Kukreja, S., Nandwal, A. S., Kumar, N., Sharma, S. K., Sharma, S. K., Unvi, V., Sharma, P. K.·2005·Biologia plantarum

Abstract

The chickpea genotype, CSG-8962 was raised in screenhouse to study salinity induced changes in ethylene evolution, antioxidative defence system and membrane integrity in relation to changes in plant water and mineral content. At vegetative stage (60 d after sowing), the plants were exposed to single saline irrigation (0, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 dS m-1). Sampling was done 3 d after saline treatments. The other sets of treated plants were re-irrigated with water and sampled after further 3 d. The Ψw of leaf and Ψs of leaf and roots decreased from -0.47 to -0.61 MPa, -0.67 to -1.23 MPa and from -0.57 to -0.95 MPa, respectively, with increasing salinity. Similarly, RWC of leaf and roots reduced from 87.5 to 72.3 % and 96.7 to 84.35 %, respectively. The decline in Ψs of roots was mainly due to accumulation of proline and total soluble sugar. With salinity, increase in ethylene evolution, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) content and ACC oxidase activity was reported. Similarly, marked increase in H2O2 content (20 - 182 %) and lipid peroxidation (43 - 170 %) was observed. The defense mechanism activated in roots was confirmed by the increased activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione transferase (GTase), glutathione reductase (GR) and catalase (CAT) but ascorbic acid (AA) content was decreased. About 3-fold increase in Na+/K+ ratio and 2.5 fold increase in Cl- content was observed. Upon desalinization, a partial recovery was observed in most of the parameters studied.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10535-005-5308-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Kukreja, S., Nandwal, A. S., Kumar, N., Sharma, S. K., Sharma, S. K., Unvi, V., & Sharma, P. K.
Venue
Biologia plantarum
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
305-308
ISSN
  • 0006-3134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-8264
OpenAlex
W2314189790
Cited by
164
References
3
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant water status, H2O2 scavenging enzymes, ethylene evolution and membrane integrity of Cicer arietinum roots as affected by salinity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10535-005-5308-4
The paper
Kukreja, S., Nandwal, A. S., Kumar, N., Sharma, S. K., Sharma, S. K., Unvi, V., & Sharma, P. K. (2005). Plant water status, H2O2 scavenging enzymes, ethylene evolution and membrane integrity of Cicer arietinum roots as affected by salinity. Biologia plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-5308-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.